Figma

Summary

The provided diff does not include the substance of the approximately 96 added words. It only states that words were added, without showing their text or identifying where they were inserted.

Legal and Risk Analysis

• Cannot assess substantive changes: The additions may affect liability, confidentiality, intellectual property, warranties, data protection, termination, or other legal obligations, but none of the actual wording is available.
• AI training and data use: The diff does not provide enough information to determine whether the customer’s data may be:
• Used to train, fine-tune, or improve artificial intelligence or machine-learning models;
• Combined with other customers’ data;
• Reviewed by human personnel or contractors;
• Retained after termination;
• De-identified or anonymized before use; or
• Used for product development, analytics, or service monitoring.
• Potential risks if AI-related language was added: Any provision permitting use of customer data for AI training should be reviewed for:
• The scope of permitted data and purposes;
• Whether use is automatic or requires customer consent or opt-in;
• Ownership of inputs, outputs, derivatives, and trained-model parameters;
• Confidentiality and protection of personal or proprietary information;
• Compliance with privacy, data-protection, confidentiality, and sector-specific laws;
• Data retention and deletion obligations; and
• Whether the customer can opt out or restrict use.

Information Needed

Please provide the actual redline text showing the 96 added words, including the surrounding clause or section heading. Without the wording, no reliable determination can be made about the legal effect or any changes concerning AI-model training.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Services and agreement structure

• The introductory provisions were substantially reorganized and now present the terms as applying to:
• Figma-owned or operated Websites;
• Starter and Professional offerings comprising the Figma Platform; and
• Figma’s published Documentation.
• These items are collectively defined as the “Services.”
• The revised text expressly states that the Terms are entered into between the Customer and Figma, Inc., and that acceptance or use of the Services binds the Customer to the Terms.
• Customers purchasing an Organization or Enterprise plan are still directed to the separate Figma Software Services Agreement.

Risk/impact: The restructuring may make the scope of the Terms clearer, but it also confirms that use of Websites, Documentation, and the Platform can independently trigger contractual acceptance.

2. Authority to bind an organization

The revised language more clearly provides that a person using the Services for an entity:

• Accepts the Terms for both themselves and the entity;
• Represents that they are authorized to accept the Terms on the entity’s behalf; and
• Agrees that references to “Customer” refer to that entity.

Risk/impact: An unauthorized employee or contractor could create an argument that the entity is contractually bound based on the user’s representation.

3. AI and use of Customer data

• The diff does not add an express provision stating that Figma may use Customer Content to train general-purpose AI models.
• The existing Usage Data provision remains materially unchanged: Figma may collect technical logs, metadata, telemetry, and other information about access, use, and performance, and may use Usage Data in de-identified and aggregated form, during and after the Term, to maintain, improve, and enhance its products and services.
• The revised Product-Specific Terms language expressly refers to:
• Figma’s artificial-intelligence features; and
• “available AI-related settings that apply to Customer Content.”
• Use of Figma AI remains subject to separate Figma AI Terms, which are now more prominently identified in the surrounding terms/policy navigation.

Risk/impact: The AI-related settings and separate Figma AI Terms may control whether Customer Content is used for model improvement, training, retention, or human review. Because those details are not included in this diff, customers should review the current Figma AI Terms and account settings. The general Usage Data license is broader than Customer Content, although it is limited to de-identified and aggregated data.

4. Other changes

• Most remaining edits are grammatical, typographical, formatting, or website-navigation changes.
• No material change is apparent to billing, automatic renewal, confidentiality, indemnity, liability limits, termination, arbitration, or export-control provisions.
• A new “See all versions” reference appears near the agreement-integration language, potentially improving access to prior versions but not changing substantive obligations.

Key Changes and Legal Risks

1. AI and use of Customer data

• The revised text expressly identifies “Figma’s artificial intelligence features” as offerings governed by Product-Specific Terms.
• It also adds that these Product-Specific Terms include “AI-related settings that apply to Customer Content.”
• This is important because use of Customer Content in connection with AI features may now be controlled by separate terms and configurable settings, rather than solely by the general Terms.
• No express new authorization to train AI models appears in the supplied diff. The existing Usage Data clause still permits Figma to collect information about access, use, and performance of the Services and use Usage Data in de-identified and aggregated form to maintain, improve, and enhance its products and services.
• The diff does not clarify whether Customer Content, prompts, outputs, or other AI inputs are used to train general-purpose or Figma-specific models. Customers should review the referenced Figma AI Terms and applicable AI settings before enabling AI features.
• Risk: Incorporation by reference to changing Product-Specific Terms and settings may create uncertainty about whether Customer Content is retained, reviewed, used for model improvement, or shared with AI providers. Organizations should seek an express contractual statement that their Customer Content is not used to train models, if that is required.

2. Contract scope and incorporated documents

• The Services definition is reorganized and now expressly incorporates Figma’s Websites, Figma Platform, and Documentation.
• The revised navigation appears to add or highlight multiple separate documents, including the Data Processing Addendum, Figma AI Terms, Software Services Agreement, Creator Agreement, Developer Terms, Community Terms, and policies.
• This increases the importance of identifying which linked terms apply and how conflicts between them are resolved.
• Organization and Enterprise customers are directed to the Software Services Agreement, rather than relying solely on these consumer/free or lower-tier Terms. Customers should confirm which agreement governs their account and whether accepting these Terms creates obligations before the enterprise agreement is signed.

3. Authority to bind an organization

• The revised language more clearly states that a person using the Services for an entity represents that they are authorized to accept the Terms on behalf of themselves and that entity.
• It further provides that references to “Customer” refer to the entity.
• Risk: An unauthorized employee or contractor could create an argument that the entity is bound, while the individual also makes a personal representation. Companies should restrict acceptance authority and account administration.

4. Other notable points

• Existing rights concerning de-identified, aggregated Usage Data remain broad and survive the Term.
• Customer remains responsible for Customer Content and Authorized Users, including related indemnity exposure.
• The Terms continue to contain automatic renewal provisions, broad termination rights, binding arbitration, and a class-action waiver.
• The final addition, “See all versions,” appears to be website or document-interface text rather than a substantive contractual amendment.

Summary

The provided diff states only that approximately 96 words were added, but it does not include the text of those additions or identify any deletions or replacements.

AI Training and Data-Use Analysis

It is therefore not possible to determine whether the changes:

• Permit the customer’s data to be used to train, fine-tune, or improve AI models;
• Expand the provider’s rights to use prompts, inputs, outputs, account data, or usage data;
• Allow data to be shared with affiliates, subprocessors, or third-party model providers;
• Change whether customer data is retained, anonymized, aggregated, or deleted;
• Create exceptions for abuse monitoring, service improvement, or legal compliance; or
• Allocate ownership or licensing rights in data, outputs, or models trained using customer data.

Legal Risks

No specific new legal risks can be identified without the actual amended language. In particular, the extent of any consent to AI training, the definition of “customer data,” and any applicable opt-out or confidentiality protections remain unknown.

Please provide the full diff, including the text enclosed in {}, [], and []{}, for a substantive legal analysis.

Summary of Important Changes

1. AI and Customer Data

• No clear new authorization to train AI models appears in this diff. The existing Usage Data provision remains materially the same: Figma may collect information about access, use, and performance of the Services and use de-identified and aggregated Usage Data during and after the term to maintain, improve, and enhance its products and services.
• Examples of Usage Data continue to include technical logs, metadata, and telemetry. This language does not expressly authorize Figma to use Customer Content, designs, files, or prompts to train general-purpose AI models.
• The revised text more explicitly identifies Figma’s artificial intelligence features and related settings applying to Customer Content as subject to Product-Specific Terms. This increases the importance of reviewing the separate Figma AI Terms and any AI-related settings. Those incorporated terms may contain the operative rules concerning:
• whether Customer Content is used for model training or improvement;
• whether training is opt-in or opt-out;
• use of prompts, outputs, and uploaded content;
• retention and deletion; and
• third-party model providers.
• Risk: The main AI-related obligations may now be located outside the main Terms and may change through the referenced Product-Specific Terms or settings. Customers should not assume the general Usage Data restriction applies to Customer Content used with AI features.

2. Scope and Contract Structure

• The agreement is reorganized and now expressly defines the “Services” as the Websites, Figma Platform, and Documentation.
• The opening language clarifies that these Terms apply primarily to Starter and Professional plans. Customers purchasing an Organization or Enterprise plan are directed to the separate Software Services Agreement.
• References to multiple separate documents have been added or made more prominent, including the Data Processing Addendum, Figma AI Terms, Community and Developer Terms, Creator Agreement, Developer Terms, and other policies. This creates a more distributed contract structure and increases the risk that important obligations are missed.

3. Authority to Bind an Organization

• The revised language more clearly states that a person using the Services for an entity represents that they are authorized to accept the Terms on the entity’s behalf.
• It also confirms that references to “Customer” mean the entity when the agreement is accepted for that entity.
• Risk: An unauthorized employee or contractor could potentially create arguments that the entity is bound, particularly where use of the Services itself constitutes acceptance.

4. Other Notable Points

• Minor wording changes modernize possessives and defined terms but generally do not alter substantive rights.
• The arbitration provisions, class-action waiver, automatic renewal, indemnity, liability limitations, and termination rights appear substantively unchanged in the supplied diff.
• A new or altered “See all versions” reference appears after language making conflicting purchase orders or customer ordering documents void. Customers should confirm whether this is merely a website/navigation artifact or a substantive cross-reference.

Recommended Review

Review the separate Figma AI Terms, Product-Specific Terms, and applicable AI settings before enabling AI features, especially for confidential, personal, regulated, or proprietary Customer Content.

Summary

Scope of the Diff

The provided diff states only:

> “Added approximately 96 words to the document”

It does not include the actual added language, deleted language, or replacement text. As a result, the legal effect of the changes cannot be determined.

AI Training and Customer Data

• No substantive language concerning customer data, artificial intelligence, machine learning, model training, or related data use is included in the diff.
• It is therefore not possible to determine whether the changes:
• Permit or restrict using customer data to train AI models;
• Distinguish between customer content, usage data, metadata, or de-identified data;
• Require consent or provide an opt-out;
• Allow human review or disclosure to third-party AI providers;
• Grant the provider ownership or broad usage rights; or
• Impose deletion, retention, confidentiality, or security obligations.

Risk Assessment

The principal issue is incomplete information. A statement that approximately 96 words were added does not identify:

• The affected contract section;
• The new rights or obligations;
• Whether existing terms were narrowed or expanded;
• Whether the additions override other provisions; or
• Whether the changes create new privacy, confidentiality, intellectual-property, or regulatory risks.

Information Needed

To perform a meaningful legal analysis, provide the actual redline text, including the 96 added words and any surrounding provisions. The relevant language should be reviewed particularly for terms such as “train,” “improve,” “develop,” “machine learning,” “artificial intelligence,” “models,” “inputs,” “outputs,” “de-identified,” “aggregated,” “service data,” and “customer content.”

Summary

The diff only states that approximately 96 words were added; it does not include the actual added language or identify any deleted or replaced terms.

Impact Assessment

Because the substantive text is missing, it is not possible to determine:

• Whether the customer’s data may be used to train, fine-tune, test, or improve AI models.
• Whether such use is permitted by default or requires customer consent.
• Whether the provider may use data in aggregated, de-identified, or anonymized form.
• Whether customer data may be shared with affiliates, subcontractors, or third-party AI providers.
• Whether the customer retains ownership of its data and any outputs.
• Whether the provider must delete or return data after termination.
• Whether confidentiality, security, or data-protection obligations have changed.
• Whether the new language creates broader rights to retain, analyze, or commercialize customer data.

Key Limitation

No legal-risk analysis can reliably be performed from the placeholder “Added approximately 96 words.” The exact added text, together with any surrounding provisions, is required—particularly the sections concerning:

• Data ownership and license rights
• Confidentiality
• Service improvement or analytics
• Artificial intelligence or machine learning
• Data retention and deletion
• Subprocessors and third-party services
• Privacy and security

Required Information

Please provide the actual 96-word addition and, if applicable, the surrounding original language. Once provided, the changes can be analyzed for new permissions, restrictions, customer obligations, and AI-training risks.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Scope and Contract Structure

• The opening provisions have been substantially reformatted and expanded with links to Figma’s broader legal materials, including the:
• Data Processing Addendum;
• Figma AI Terms;
• Software Services Agreement;
• Creator, Developer, Community, and Live Events terms; and
• various policies and guidelines.
• The operative agreement remains the Terms of Service, but the presentation now more clearly distinguishes the Terms from other product- or customer-specific agreements.
• The Services definition continues to cover Figma’s Websites, Starter and Professional offerings, and Documentation. The language appears to clarify that these materials are collectively called the “Services.”

2. Organization and Enterprise Customers

• The revised text expressly directs customers purchasing an Organization or Enterprise plan to the separate Figma Software Services Agreement.
• This is important because customers may otherwise assume these Terms govern all paid offerings. Enterprise and Organization customers should confirm which agreement controls and whether terms are incorporated by reference.

3. Authority to Bind an Entity

• The authorization representation has been restated and completed. A person using the Services for an entity represents that they are authorized to accept the Terms on behalf of:
• themselves; and
• the entity.
• References to “Customer” will refer to that entity.
• Risk: An unauthorized employee or contractor could potentially create contractual exposure for the organization, although the practical enforceability of that representation may depend on applicable law and the user’s actual authority.

4. AI and Use of Customer Data

• The diff does not add an express provision stating that Figma may use Customer Content to train general-purpose AI models.
• The existing Usage Data provision remains: Figma may collect technical logs, metadata, telemetry, and other service-related information and use it in de-identified and aggregated form, during and after the term, to maintain, improve, and enhance its products and services.
• The revised Product-Specific Terms provision expressly identifies Figma’s artificial-intelligence features and “AI-related settings that apply to Customer Content.” This highlights that AI use of Customer Content may be governed by separate Figma AI Terms or settings, rather than solely by these Terms.
• Risk: The excerpt does not establish the precise limits on AI processing, model training, retention, human review, or whether customer opt-out choices apply. Customers using Figma AI should review the separate Figma AI Terms and account settings, particularly for confidential, regulated, or proprietary content.

5. Other Changes

• Most remaining changes are grammatical, punctuation, terminology, or navigation/link updates and do not appear to materially alter substantive rights or obligations.
• Existing commercial risks remain, including automatic subscription and AI-credit renewals, Figma’s broad termination rights, customer indemnification for Customer Content and breaches, and binding individual arbitration with a class-action waiver unless properly opted out.

Structured Summary of Important Changes

1. Scope and organization of the Terms

• The opening provisions have been substantially reformatted and expanded to describe Figma’s legal-resource pages, including the Data Processing Addendum, Figma AI Terms, Software Services Agreement, Community and Developer Terms, and other policies.
• The definition of “Services” is restated to include:
• Figma-owned or operated websites;
• the Figma Platform for Starter and Professional plans; and
• Figma’s Documentation.
• Organization and Enterprise customers are expressly directed to the separate Software Services Agreement, rather than these consumer/free or lower-tier Terms.

Risk/impact: Customers should confirm which agreement governs their account, particularly where an organization uses multiple plan types or upgrades during the relationship. The expanded references to external policies and product-specific terms may make the contractual framework more dependent on linked documents.

2. Authority to bind an organization

The revised language clarifies that a person using the Services for an entity represents that:

• they are authorized to accept the Terms on behalf of that entity; and
• references to “Customer” mean both the individual and, where applicable, the entity they represent.

Risk/impact: An unauthorized employee or contractor could potentially create arguments about individual responsibility or authority. Organizations should limit acceptance authority and ensure administrators understand that account actions may bind the Customer.

3. AI-related terms and use of Customer data

No clear substantive change to AI training rights appears in this diff.

The revised text continues to refer users of Figma’s artificial-intelligence features to separate Figma AI Terms and to “AI-related settings that apply to Customer Content.” The diff does not add an express right for Figma to train AI models on Customer Content, nor does it remove an existing express prohibition or consent requirement.

The separate Usage Data provision remains materially the same: Figma may collect technical logs, metadata, telemetry, and other access/use/performance information and use it in de-identified and aggregated form to maintain, improve, and enhance its products and services.

Risk/impact:

• Usage Data may still be used for product improvement, including potentially AI-related improvement, provided it is de-identified and aggregated under this clause.
• The precise treatment of prompts, outputs, uploaded files, and other Customer Content remains dependent on the separate Figma AI Terms and applicable settings. Those documents should be reviewed before enabling AI features.
• The Customer Content indemnity remains broad, covering third-party claims arising from Customer Content.

4. Other apparent changes

Most remaining changes are grammatical, punctuation, capitalization, or website-navigation changes. The apparent addition of “See all versions” appears to be a documentation/interface artifact rather than a substantive contractual term.

Overall assessment

The principal legal changes are clarification of covered Services, separation of Organization/Enterprise agreements, and stronger entity-authorization language. The diff does not itself materially change AI-model training permissions, but AI data-use rights remain partly incorporated by reference to separate Figma AI Terms and settings.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual added, deleted, or replaced legal language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 96 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to determine:

• What contractual terms changed;
• Whether liability, confidentiality, security, intellectual property, or termination rights were affected;
• Whether the customer’s data may be used for artificial intelligence or machine-learning purposes;
• Whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models;
• Whether such use is mandatory or optional;
• Whether data may be shared with affiliates, vendors, or third-party AI providers; or
• Whether any opt-out, consent, deletion, anonymization, or data-retention rights were added or removed.

AI-Training Risk Assessment

No AI-related change can be identified from the information supplied. The added 96 words could potentially contain material changes, but the text is necessary to assess whether the customer’s data may be:

• Used to train or improve provider or third-party models;
• Combined with other customers’ data;
• De-identified or anonymized before use;
• Retained after contract termination;
• Used to generate model outputs or product analytics; or
• Disclosed to subprocessors or AI service providers.

Required Information

Please provide the actual diff, including the 96 added words and any deletion or replacement markup. Once provided, the changes can be analyzed for legal effect and specific customer-data and AI-training risks.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual contractual language that was added, deleted, or replaced. It only states:

> “Added approximately 96 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to determine what legal terms changed or whether the amendment creates new obligations or risks.

AI Training and Customer Data

No substantive language addressing AI, machine learning, model training, customer data, data usage, data retention, anonymization, or related rights is included in the supplied diff.

Therefore, it cannot be determined whether the revised document:

• Permits the provider to use customer data to train AI models;
• Restricts or prohibits such training;
• Allows use of prompts, inputs, outputs, or metadata for model improvement;
• Requires consent or provides an opt-out right;
• Applies de-identification or aggregation requirements;
• Grants the provider ownership or licensing rights in customer data or generated outputs; or
• Creates confidentiality, security, deletion, or regulatory risks.

Required Information

To perform a meaningful legal analysis, provide the actual 96 words added, together with any deleted or replacement text using the stated notation:

• Additions: {new language}
• Deletions: [deleted language]
• Replacements: [old language]{new language}

Without the underlying text, no reliable assessment of the contractual changes or associated risks can be made.

Executive Summary

The diff is largely a website/navigation and formatting update rather than a substantive rewrite. Most changes replace punctuation, curly apostrophes, headings, or links with updated website content. The principal legal changes concern contract scope, authority to bind organizations, and incorporation of AI-specific terms.

Important Substantive Changes

1. Expanded and clarified definition of the Services

The revised text expressly defines the “Services” to include:

• Figma-owned or operated Websites;
• The Figma Platform offered under Starter and Professional plans; and
• Figma’s published Documentation.

This is primarily a clarification, but it may broaden the materials treated as contractually relevant Services. Customers should monitor incorporated Documentation because it may be updated separately.

2. Organization and Enterprise customers directed to a separate agreement

The revised language states that customers purchasing an Organization or Enterprise plan should refer to the Figma Software Services Agreement, rather than relying solely on these Terms.

This creates a potential contract-interpretation issue: customers must determine which agreement governs, and whether both agreements or linked product-specific terms apply. The revised Terms also state that orders or customer purchasing documents inconsistent with the Terms are void, now apparently covering “all versions” of such documents. This may limit the effect of procurement portals, purchase orders, or negotiated customer terms unless expressly accepted by Figma.

3. Authority to bind an entity is made more explicit

The revised text clarifies that a person using the Services for an entity represents that:

• They are authorized to accept the Terms on the entity’s behalf; and
• References to “Customer” refer to that entity.

This increases the contractual responsibility of the individual accepting the Terms and may create exposure if the person lacks actual authority.

AI and Customer Data

No clear new permission to train AI models

The diff does not add an express statement that Figma may use Customer Content to train general-purpose or Figma AI models. The existing Usage Data provision remains materially unchanged: Figma may collect technical logs, metadata, telemetry, and other service-use information, and use it in de-identified and aggregated form to maintain, improve, and enhance its products and services.

That provision is not expressly limited to AI training, although “improve and enhance” could potentially encompass product-development activities involving machine learning, subject to the de-identification and aggregation requirement.

AI-specific terms are expressly highlighted

The revised Product-Specific Terms provision expressly identifies:

> “Figma’s artificial intelligence features, including available AI-related settings that apply to Customer Content”

as offerings governed by separate Product-Specific Terms.

This is important because the treatment of Customer Content in connection with AI features may be controlled primarily by the separate Figma AI Terms and related settings, not by these general Terms. Customers should review those terms for:

• Whether Customer Content is used for model training or improvement;
• Available opt-out or administrative controls;
• Retention and deletion practices;
• Use of third-party AI providers; and
• Ownership and confidentiality protections.

Overall Risk Assessment

The diff presents limited direct change to AI-data rights, but it increases the importance of reviewing separately incorporated AI terms and settings. Customers should not assume that the general Usage Data restriction fully governs Customer Content submitted to Figma AI.

Structured Summary of Important Changes

1. Scope and Contract Structure

• The document’s introductory language has been substantially reorganized.
• The Services are now expressly defined as:
• Figma-operated Websites;
• Figma Platform offerings under Starter and Professional plans; and
• Figma’s published Documentation.
• The revised text directs customers purchasing an Organization or Enterprise plan to the separate Figma Software Services Agreement. This clarates that these Terms primarily govern individual, free, Starter, and Professional use, while larger business arrangements may be governed by a different agreement.
• The list of linked legal materials has been expanded or reorganized to include the Data Processing Addendum, Figma AI Terms, Community and Developer Terms, Creator Agreement, Developer Terms, event terms, policies, guidelines, privacy materials, and intellectual-property materials. These incorporated or linked documents may contain additional obligations and should be reviewed together with these Terms.
• The prior acceptance language has been replaced with a clearer statement that acceptance of the Terms or use of the Services constitutes agreement.
• The entity-authority provision has been moved and clarified: a person using the Services for an entity represents that they are authorized to bind that entity, and “Customer” refers to the entity. This increases the risk of personal or organizational consequences if the user lacks authority.

2. Customer Data and AI Model Training

• No clear new authorization to train AI models on Customer Content appears in this diff.
• The existing Usage Data provision remains materially unchanged. Figma may collect technical logs, metadata, telemetry, and other information concerning access, use, and performance, and may use Usage Data in de-identified and aggregated form, during and after the contract term, to maintain, improve, and enhance its products and services.
• The Terms now expressly identify Figma’s AI features and “AI-related settings that apply to Customer Content” as subject to separate Product-Specific Terms, including the Figma AI Terms. This means AI data-use and training rules may be located outside the main Terms and could vary by feature or setting.
• Customers should verify whether the separate AI Terms:
• permit prompts, outputs, files, or Customer Content to be used for model training;
• provide an opt-out or enterprise exclusion;
• distinguish between service improvement and training general-purpose models; and
• impose responsibility on the Customer for obtaining rights and consent.

3. Other Notable Changes

• Minor changes standardize punctuation, capitalization, quotation marks, and possessives; these appear non-substantive.
• Subscription and AI-credit provisions are largely unchanged, including automatic renewal and separate Figma AI credit terms.
• The arbitration, class-action waiver, confidentiality, indemnity, liability, termination, and export-control provisions appear substantively unchanged in the supplied diff.
• The final language appears to add “all versions” to a provision making inconsistent customer ordering documents void. This may strengthen Figma’s position against conflicting procurement or vendor-portal terms and should be confirmed against the complete clause.

Summary

The supplied diff states only that approximately 96 words were added. It does not include the actual added language or identify any deleted or replaced provisions.

Legal and Commercial Impact

• No substantive changes can be determined from the information provided.
• It is not possible to assess whether the additions modify:
• Customer data ownership or licensing rights;
• Confidentiality or permitted-use restrictions;
• Data retention, security, or deletion obligations;
• Liability, indemnification, or compliance requirements;
• Audit, notice, or termination rights; or
• Service-provider rights to share data with affiliates or third parties.

AI Model Training

• The diff does not provide enough text to determine whether customer data may be:
• Used to train, fine-tune, or improve AI models;
• Combined with other customers’ data;
• Subjected to human review or automated analysis;
• Retained after the customer’s use of the services ends; or
• Used for model training on an opt-in, opt-out, or unrestricted basis.
• No specific change concerning AI training can be identified from the metadata alone.

Risk Assessment

The principal issue is insufficient information, rather than a specific contractual risk. The full 96-word addition—and, if applicable, the surrounding provisions—should be reviewed before determining whether the amendment expands the provider’s rights to use customer data or creates new customer obligations.

The publisher records this document as revised on this date (“Effective DateJune 2, 2026”).