prismatic.io

Summary

The supplied diff contains only the statement:

> “Added approximately 37 words to the document”

It does not include the actual added, deleted, or replaced legal language.

Legal and Commercial Impact

• No substantive contractual change can be identified from the information provided.
• It is not possible to determine whether the amendment affects:
• Customer data rights or ownership
• Data collection, storage, sharing, or disclosure
• Confidentiality or privacy obligations
• Use of customer data to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models
• Customer consent or opt-out rights
• Data retention or deletion
• Security, indemnification, liability, or regulatory compliance

AI Training-Data Review

The diff provides no language addressing whether customer data may be:

• Used to train general-purpose or provider-specific AI models
• Used for model improvement, testing, analytics, or product development
• De-identified, aggregated, or combined with other data
• Shared with affiliates, contractors, or AI service providers
• Excluded from training by default or only upon customer opt-out

Accordingly, no conclusion can be reached about whether the customer’s data-use rights or AI-training exposure have changed.

Required Information

Please provide the actual 37-word addition and any corresponding deletions or replacements. Without the amended legal text, a reliable contract-risk analysis is not possible.

Summary

The provided diff states only that approximately 37 words were removed from the document. It does not identify:

• Which provisions were changed;
• The text that was deleted;
• Whether any language was added or replaced; or
• Whether the deletion affects data rights, confidentiality, intellectual property, privacy, or AI training.

AI Training and Data Use

No conclusions can be drawn about changes to the customer’s data being used to train AI models. In particular, the diff does not reveal whether the document now:

• Permits or restricts using customer data to train, fine-tune, or improve AI models;
• Allows use of customer prompts, inputs, outputs, or usage data for model development;
• Requires customer consent or provides an opt-out;
• Limits training to anonymized, aggregated, or de-identified data;
• Grants the provider ownership or a broad license over customer data;
• Requires deletion or segregation of customer data; or
• Imposes confidentiality, security, or retention obligations relating to AI use.

Risk Assessment

The deletion could be legally significant, but its effect cannot be assessed without the actual deleted language. Removing approximately 37 words could, for example, eliminate a customer protection, narrow a restriction on data use, remove a consent requirement, or delete an obligation concerning confidentiality or AI training.

Needed Information

Please provide the actual before-and-after contract text, with the deleted words shown in brackets and additions in braces. Without that text, no reliable legal comparison or identification of new risks is possible.

Summary of Important Changes

Overall assessment

The diff appears primarily to clean up formatting, navigation links, punctuation, and website footer content. It does not materially revise the substantive Terms of Use provisions shown.

Data use and AI-model training

• No changes expressly address AI, machine learning, model training, or use of customer data to train models.
• The revisions do not add or remove any license allowing Prismatic to use customer-provided data, prompts, outputs, account information, or usage data for AI training.
• The reference to the Privacy Policy remains, but the Privacy Policy itself is not included in the diff. Any AI-training permissions or restrictions may therefore still exist there and should be reviewed separately.
• The trial-data provision remains substantively unchanged: data entered or collected during a trial “will not be stored or available after the trial ends.” This is important operationally, but the diff does not clarify:
• when deletion occurs;
• whether backups or logs are retained;
• whether data may be used before deletion; or
• whether data is used for analytics, service improvement, or AI training.

Potentially relevant legal changes

Expanded legal-policy navigation

The Legal Center links now expressly list:

• Terms of Use;
• Acceptable Use Policy;
• Privacy Policy;
• Security Policy; and
• PGP Key.

This improves access to related policies but may also make those policies more prominent as part of the customer’s compliance review. The diff does not state that these policies are incorporated into the Terms or explain how conflicts are resolved.

Clarification of defined terms and formatting

• “Prismatic’s,” “we,” “our,” and “us” are formatted more clearly.
• Defined terms such as “Terms,” “Services,” “Site Content,” and “Trial” receive improved punctuation and quotation formatting.
• These changes appear non-substantive.

Site-content restriction

The restriction on reproducing, modifying, distributing, transmitting, posting, or otherwise using Site Content remains. The revised text expressly includes “mirror,” but this appears to be a formatting or punctuation correction rather than a new restriction.

Contact information

The revised footer adds:

• Email: info@prismatic.io
• Phone: 888-305-5453

This provides additional contact methods and does not appear to change legal obligations.

Risk assessment

No new material customer liability, indemnity, warranty, limitation-of-liability, governing-law, or dispute-resolution language is shown. The principal unresolved issue is that the diff provides no transparency about AI training or other secondary uses of customer data; those terms, if any, must be checked in the Privacy Policy and the Services-specific agreement.

Executive Summary

The diff appears primarily to clean up website formatting and remove navigation/footer text rather than change the substantive legal terms. No new provisions were added concerning customer data, artificial intelligence, machine learning, or training models.

Important Changes

1. No AI-training or data-use language added

• The revised text contains no express authorization for Prismatic to use customer data, prompts, inputs, outputs, usage data, or other information to:
• train or fine-tune AI models;
• develop machine-learning systems;
• improve AI or other services; or
• share data with AI providers for those purposes.
• There is also no apparent deletion of an AI-training provision in the supplied diff.
• Accordingly, the Terms do not appear to expand or restrict AI-training rights. Any such rights may instead be addressed in the Privacy Policy, service agreement, data-processing terms, or other product-specific terms.

2. Trial data deletion language retained

The Terms continue to state that:

> “ANY DATA YOU ENTER OR THAT IS COLLECTED DURING YOUR TRIAL WILL NOT BE STORED OR AVAILABLE AFTER THE TRIAL ENDS.”

This is significant for trial users and appears unchanged. It may provide a stronger contractual statement against post-trial retention, although the clause does not explain backup retention, legal retention, aggregated data, or whether data could be used before deletion.

3. Privacy Policy remains incorporated

The Terms continue to direct users to the Privacy Policy regarding the collection and storage of information. Because the Terms incorporate or operate alongside the Privacy Policy, data-use rights—including any AI-related processing—could be located there rather than in these Terms. Users should review that policy separately.

4. Potential removal of contact information

The displayed revision removes the email address and telephone number from the contact section, leaving the company name and mailing address. This could make it less clear how users are expected to submit questions, notices, or complaints. The change may be only a website-rendering or footer-formatting issue, but it should be confirmed in the operative published version.

5. Formatting and drafting changes

Numerous changes remove quotation marks, brackets, spacing, and navigation links. These appear non-substantive. The visible revision also states that the document was updated on March 17, 2023 and that substantial changes were made, but the diff does not identify substantive changes beyond formatting and possible contact-information removal.

Risk Assessment

• AI/data-training risk: No change visible; rights remain unclear unless addressed elsewhere.
• Customer-data risk: Trial data deletion language remains important but incomplete on backups, aggregations, and pre-deletion use.
• Notice/contact risk: Removal of direct contact details may hinder communications.
• Recommended action: Compare the full Privacy Policy and any Services Agreement for AI-training, data ownership, retention, subprocessors, and model-improvement provisions.

Summary

The provided diff states only that approximately 37 words were added. It does not include the actual added language or identify where it appears in the agreement.

Legal and Commercial Impact

• Substantive changes cannot be assessed without the text of the additions.
• It is not possible to determine whether the new language changes:
• Customer or provider rights and obligations;
• Data ownership, licensing, confidentiality, or security;
• Liability, indemnification, warranties, or compliance duties;
• Termination or post-termination data handling; or
• The scope of permitted service use.

AI Training and Data Use

The diff does not provide enough information to determine whether the added language:

• Permits the provider to use customer data, prompts, outputs, or metadata to train, fine-tune, test, or improve AI models;
• Limits such use to aggregated, anonymized, or de-identified data;
• Requires customer consent or provides an opt-out;
• Allows use by affiliates, contractors, or third-party model providers;
• Grants a broad, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free license; or
• Requires deletion or prevents retention of customer data used for training.

Recommended Next Step

Obtain the actual 37-word addition, preferably showing its location and surrounding provisions. The AI-training implications and any new legal risks cannot reliably be analyzed from the description alone.

Summary of Important Changes

Overall nature of the changes

The diff appears primarily to be a formatting, rendering, or content-cleanup revision rather than a substantive rewrite of the Terms of Use. Most changes remove navigation text, hyperlink labels, punctuation, quotation marks, apostrophes, and spacing from the displayed document.

Changes affecting legal terms

• Contract formation and updates: The wording remains substantively unchanged: accessing the Site constitutes agreement to the Terms, and continued use after updated Terms are posted constitutes consent to the revised Terms.
• Services and trial accounts: The Terms continue to state that trial use of the development platform and related Services is governed by the Terms.
• Trial data deletion: The provision remains that data entered or collected during a trial “will not be stored or available after the trial ends.” This is an important customer-data consequence, particularly for users who may expect data retention or retrieval.
• Disclaimers and liability: The “as is” and “as available” disclaimers remain. The liability limitations also appear unchanged in substance.
• Indemnification: The phrase concerning attorneys’ fees was changed from “attorneys’ fees” to “attorneys fees.” This is likely a grammatical or formatting error, but it could create minor ambiguity. The revised text also appears to contain a duplicated phrase: “arising from or related to arising out of or related to.” That should be corrected for clarity.
• Governing law, dispute resolution, and general terms: No substantive change is apparent.
• Document date and revision note: The document continues to identify March 17, 2023 and states that substantial changes were made throughout the document.

Customer data and AI model training

• No express change concerning AI training was identified.
• The diff does not add or remove language authorizing Prismatic to use customer data, Site data, usage data, prompts, outputs, or other content to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models.
• It also does not add restrictions prohibiting such training or provide an opt-out.
• The only directly relevant data-use provision is the unchanged trial-account statement that trial data will not be stored or available after the trial ends.
• The reference to a Website Data Collection Policy remains in the footer, but the diff does not show that policy’s contents. That policy should be reviewed separately for any AI-training or data-sharing rights.

Practical risks and follow-up

• Verify that removed navigation and legal-policy links do not prevent users from accessing the Privacy Policy, Acceptable Use Policy, Security Policy, or other incorporated policies.
• Correct the apparent indemnification drafting errors.
• Review the Privacy Policy and Website Data Collection Policy separately for AI-related data-use terms, since this Terms diff does not address them.

Summary of Important Changes

1. New website data-collection notice

The updated text adds:

> “We use cookies and similar technologies to collect data to improve your site experience.”

This is a new disclosure that the website may collect information through cookies and similar technologies. It suggests possible collection of browsing, device, usage, and interaction data, although the exact categories are not specified.

Potential risks/issues:

• The notice does not explain what data is collected, why it is collected beyond “improving your site experience,” how long it is retained, or with whom it is shared.
• It does not identify whether cookies are necessary, analytics-related, advertising-related, or used for profiling.
• Depending on the applicable jurisdiction, this short notice may not by itself satisfy consent, transparency, or “do not sell/share” requirements.
• “By using our website and/or providing your contact information, you agree” may be insufficient where affirmative consent is required, particularly for non-essential cookies or certain types of processing.
• The notice refers to a separate Website Data Collection Policy, but that policy is not included in the diff. Its terms should be reviewed for the actual scope of data use.

2. Consent and preference-management language

The addition states:

> “Manage your preferences. ✕”

This indicates that users may have a mechanism to manage cookie or data-collection preferences. However, the text does not explain:

• Which choices are available;
• Whether users can reject non-essential cookies;
• Whether consent can later be withdrawn;
• Whether declining cookies affects access to services; or
• Whether the preference tool records consent.

The “✕” may merely dismiss the notice rather than constitute rejection, which could create ambiguity about whether closing the banner is treated as consent.

3. AI training and use of customer data

The diff contains no express new language stating that customer data, contact information, cookie data, or website activity may be used to train AI models.

The phrase “AI for Integrations” appears to be pre-existing text rather than a new addition based on the markup provided. It therefore does not, by itself, create a clear AI-training authorization.

Nevertheless, the new reference to collecting data to “improve your site experience” is broad and could potentially encompass analytics, personalization, or automated systems. The Website Data Collection Policy should be checked for any provisions allowing data to be used to develop, train, fine-tune, or improve AI models, including models operated by third parties.

4. Drafting/formatting concern

The text appears to contain a formatting issue: “PlatformWe”. This should be corrected, as it could create ambiguity about the affected product or the beginning of the privacy notice.

Summary

The provided diff only states: “Removed approximately 39 words from the document.” It does not identify which words were deleted or provide the surrounding contract language.

Legal and Business Impact

• Cannot determine the substantive effect: The deleted language could affect liability, confidentiality, intellectual property, warranties, termination rights, data usage, or other obligations.
• AI training provisions: No conclusion can be reached about whether the deletion:
• permits or restricts using customer data to train AI models;
• changes whether customer data may be used to improve models;
• removes consent, opt-out, or deletion rights;
• changes ownership of inputs, outputs, or derived data; or
• affects confidentiality or data-security protections.
• Potential risk: If the deleted text concerned customer-data usage or AI training, removing it could either reduce customer protections or remove a provider’s express authorization. The direction and magnitude of the risk cannot be assessed without the actual wording.

Information Needed

Please provide the actual redline or the deleted text, preferably with surrounding provisions. The analysis should compare:

1. The original language;

2. The revised language; and

3. Any related definitions, especially “Customer Data,” “Usage Data,” “Content,” “Inputs,” “Outputs,” “de-identified data,” and “Train” or “Improve.”

Summary of Important Changes

1. New website data-collection notice

The diff adds a notice stating that the website and/or the user’s contact information may be subject to collection and processing:

> “We use cookies and similar technologies to collect data to improve your site experience. By using our website and/or providing your contact information, you agree to our data collection and processing practices per our Website Data Collection Policy.”

It also adds a “Manage your preferences” option.

2. Potential legal and privacy risks

• Implied consent by use: The notice says that merely using the website or providing contact information constitutes agreement to the data-collection practices. Depending on the applicable privacy laws, this may not be sufficient for all types of processing, particularly targeted advertising, sensitive data, or other activities requiring affirmative consent.
• Incorporation of an external policy: The notice incorporates the separate Website Data Collection Policy, but that policy is not included in the diff. Its contents should be reviewed to determine:
• What data is collected;
• The purposes of collection and use;
• Whether data is shared with vendors or affiliates;
• Retention periods;
• International transfers;
• User rights and opt-out mechanisms; and
• Whether cookies are used for analytics, advertising, or profiling.
• Ambiguous scope: The language covers both cookies and “contact information,” but does not explain whether contact information will be used for marketing, profiling, lead generation, or other purposes.
• Preference controls: Although a preference-management option is added, the notice does not state whether users can reject non-essential cookies without losing access to the website.

3. AI-model training

The diff does not expressly add, remove, or modify any provision stating that customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models.

The existing navigation item “AI for Integrations” remains visible, but it is not a substantive data-use term. It does not, by itself, authorize AI training or clarify whether customer content, personal data, prompts, outputs, or integration data are used for model development.

4. Other apparent changes

The diff appears to alter or corrupt the wording around “White Label Integration Platform” and “Platform”—shown as Platform changing to PlatformWe. This may be a formatting or text-merging error rather than a deliberate contractual amendment, but the final website text should be checked.

Recommended follow-up

Confirm the contents of the Website Data Collection Policy and add explicit language addressing whether customer data is used for AI training, including opt-out rights, permitted data categories, retention, and safeguards.

Summary of Important Changes

1. No apparent change to AI-training rights

• The diff contains no provision authorizing Prismatic to use customer data, Site data, Trial data, or Services data to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models.
• It also contains no new language addressing:
• AI model ownership;
• use of prompts, inputs, outputs, or usage data;
• whether customer data is anonymized or aggregated before AI use;
• sharing data with AI providers; or
• opting out of AI training.
• Accordingly, this diff does not appear to create a new contractual right to train AI models on customer data.
• Any such rights may instead appear in the separately referenced Privacy Policy, Services terms, or another agreement, which should be reviewed independently.

2. Trial-data deletion language retained

The Terms continue to state that:

> “ANY DATA YOU ENTER OR THAT IS COLLECTED DURING YOUR TRIAL WILL NOT BE STORED OR AVAILABLE AFTER THE TRIAL ENDS.”

This is important for customers using trial accounts. The provision appears to remain substantively unchanged, but it is broad and could encompass customer content, personal data, configuration data, logs, and other information collected during a trial. Customers should preserve any required data before trial expiration and confirm whether backups, legal retention, or subprocessors affect this promise.

3. Broader legal-policy presentation

The revised text adds or exposes links to:

• Terms of Use;
• Acceptable Use Policy;
• Privacy Policy;
• Security Policy; and
• PGP Key.

This improves access to related policies but may also make those documents more prominent as part of the governing legal framework. Customers should verify whether the linked policies are incorporated into the agreement and whether Prismatic can change them unilaterally.

4. Website terms and update mechanism remain

The Terms continue to cover both Site use and trial access to the development platform. They also continue to state that posting updated Terms constitutes notice and that continued use constitutes acceptance. This creates a risk that material changes may become binding without an individually signed amendment.

5. Liability and indemnity wording clarified

• The liability cap wording was grammatically corrected from “PRISMATIC S” to “PRISMATIC'S.”
• Indemnity language was clarified to refer to claims “arising from or related to” the Terms or use/misuse of the Site or Site Content.
• The indemnity still appears broad and includes attorneys’ fees, potentially exposing a user to significant defense and reimbursement obligations.

6. Administrative and formatting changes

• Contact information now includes an email address and telephone number.
• Navigation, headings, punctuation, quotation marks, and spacing were substantially cleaned up.
• Footer and marketing content was added.
• References to “Trial” and “Services” were formatted more clearly.

These changes appear primarily editorial or website-related and do not, by themselves, materially alter customer data rights.

Executive Summary

The diff appears to be primarily a formatting and text-normalization change rather than a substantive revision to the Terms of Use. Many edits remove apostrophes, quotation marks, and certain punctuation, likely due to document extraction or rendering issues. However, several legal provisions and website disclosures should be noted.

Important Changes and Risks

1. AI model training and customer data

• No express change addresses AI training.
• The diff contains no new or deleted language stating whether Prismatic may use customer data, account data, prompts, content, usage data, or integration data to train artificial intelligence or machine-learning models.
• The footer contains marketing language referring to “AI for Integrations,” but this does not create or clarify a contractual right to use customer data for AI training.
• The Terms continue to refer generally to the Privacy Policy for collection and storage of information. The Privacy Policy and any service agreement, data-processing addendum, or AI-specific policy should therefore be reviewed separately for data-use and model-training provisions.

2. Trial-account data deletion

• The provision remains substantially unchanged: data entered or collected during a trial will not be stored or available after the trial ends.
• This creates a potential customer risk if trial data is important, because the language does not promise export assistance, retention, backup, or recovery after termination.
• The clause also does not explain whether data may be retained temporarily in backups, logs, security systems, or third-party services.

3. Terms apply to Services

• The text continues to state that trial use of Prismatic’s development platform and related services is governed by the Terms.
• The language appears to clarify that the Services facilitate development, hosting, and delivery of software integrations, but no major allocation of data ownership or usage rights is added.

4. Website disclaimers and liability

• The “as is” and “as available” disclaimer remains.
• Prismatic’s broad limitation of liability remains, including exclusion of consequential or indirect damages and a cap on aggregate liability.
• The customer indemnification obligation remains broad and covers claims related to use or misuse of the Site or Site Content. The wording change from “attorneys’ fees” to “attorneys fees” appears stylistic, not substantive.

5. Governing law and dispute resolution

• No material change is apparent to the governing-law, venue, or jurisdiction provisions.

6. Privacy and other policies

• The Terms continue to incorporate or reference the Privacy Policy.
• The footer references a Website Data Collection Policy and consent to data collection and processing when using the website or providing contact information. This may affect website visitors and lead/contact data, but the diff does not add specific AI-training permissions.

Overall Assessment

No clear new legal right to train AI models on customer data appears in this diff. The principal practical risks remain trial-data deletion, broad disclaimers and liability limitations, and potentially incorporated privacy/data-collection policies that are not included here.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Website data collection notice added

A new notice has been added stating that the website may:

• Use cookies and similar technologies.
• Collect data to improve the website experience.
• Collect and process visitors’ contact information.
• Operate under a separate Website Data Collection Policy.
• Allow users to manage their preferences.

Risk: This creates express representations about data collection and consent. The business should ensure that the Website Data Collection Policy accurately describes the data collected, purposes, vendors, retention periods, tracking technologies, and user rights. The phrase “By using our website and/or providing your contact information, you agree” may not satisfy consent requirements in jurisdictions requiring affirmative consent, especially for non-essential cookies or marketing communications.

2. Consent and preference-management language

The notice includes a “Manage your preferences” option and a close (“✕”) control.

Risk: Simply closing the notice may not constitute valid consent or withdrawal of consent. The implementation should distinguish between essential and non-essential cookies and should preserve users’ choices. Consent records may also need to be maintained.

3. Apparent text or formatting corruption

The diff changes or adds text around:

• “White Label Integration”
• “Platform”
• “PlatformWe”

The resulting text appears to merge unrelated website copy, suggesting a possible drafting, formatting, or deployment error.

Risk: Ambiguous or corrupted public-facing language could create uncertainty about the product being offered and the applicable terms. The final text should be reviewed before publication.

4. AI-model training and customer data

The diff contains the phrase “AI for Integrations,” but it does not add, remove, or modify any express provision addressing:

• Whether customer data may be used to train AI models.
• Whether prompts, outputs, or usage data are retained.
• Whether data is used to improve products or models.
• Opt-out rights.
• Human review, confidentiality, or third-party model providers.

Conclusion: No specific change to customer-data AI-training rights is identifiable from this diff. However, the new general data-collection language should not be treated as authorization to use customer data for AI training unless the governing agreement or privacy policy clearly says so.

Summary

The diff only states that “approximately 36 words” were added, but does not provide the actual added contract language.

Legal and Risk Analysis

• No substantive changes can be identified from the information provided.
• AI training and data use: The diff does not reveal whether customer data may be:
• Used to train, fine-tune, or improve AI models;
• Combined with other customers’ data;
• Reviewed by humans for model development;
• Retained after contract termination; or
• Shared with affiliates, vendors, or third-party AI providers.
• Risk assessment: It is not possible to determine whether the added language expands the provider’s rights to use customer data, creates new confidentiality or privacy risks, or imposes additional customer obligations.

Required Information

Please provide the actual 36 added words, using the stated notation:

• {added text}
• [deleted text]
• [old text]{new text}

Without the text of the addition, a meaningful legal comparison cannot be performed.

Summary of Changes

Overall Change

• Approximately 75 words were removed from the document.
• The deleted language is not provided, so the exact legal and commercial effect cannot be determined.

AI Training and Customer Data

• No specific conclusion can be reached about whether the contract’s treatment of customer data for AI training has changed.
• The deleted text could have:
• Authorized or prohibited using customer data to train, fine-tune, or improve AI models;
• Limited training to aggregated, anonymized, or de-identified data;
• Required customer consent or provided an opt-out right;
• Restricted the use of prompts, inputs, outputs, confidential information, or personal data;
• Required deletion, retention limits, security measures, or notice regarding training;
• Addressed whether data would be used by the provider, affiliates, or third-party AI vendors.

Potential Risks

Because the removed language is unavailable, the principal risk is loss of contractual protections or limitations that may have appeared in the deleted text. In particular:

• If the deletion removed a prohibition or restriction on AI training, the provider may now have broader practical freedom to use customer data, depending on the remaining contract language.
• If the deletion removed an authorization to train models, the provider’s AI-training rights may have narrowed.
• If definitions, exceptions, or data-use conditions were deleted, the remaining provisions may become ambiguous.
• Deleting confidentiality, security, privacy, or data-retention language could materially increase customer risk.
• Deleting customer consent, notice, audit, or opt-out provisions could reduce the customer’s control over data use.

Required Follow-Up

To perform a reliable legal comparison, obtain:

1. The exact 75 words that were removed;

2. The surrounding provisions and defined terms;

3. Any related privacy policy, data-processing agreement, or AI terms incorporated by reference;

4. The current and prior versions of the contract.

Bottom line: The diff confirms a deletion but does not provide enough information to determine whether customer data may now be used to train AI models or whether related protections were weakened.

Summary

The provided diff does not contain the actual amended legal language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 75 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to determine what terms changed or whether the additions create new legal risks.

AI Training and Customer Data

No language was provided addressing:

• Whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, test, or improve AI models;
• Whether prompts, inputs, outputs, or usage data are retained;
• Whether data is anonymized, aggregated, or de-identified before use;
• Whether third-party AI providers may access or use customer data;
• Whether the customer can opt out of AI training or data-use activities;
• Ownership or licensing rights in customer data, inputs, outputs, or model improvements; or
• Security, confidentiality, deletion, or geographic-transfer obligations relating to AI processing.

Therefore, no conclusion can be reached about changes to AI-training rights or related risks.

Required Information

Please provide the actual 75-word addition, including any surrounding language if necessary to understand defined terms and how the new provision interacts with the existing agreement.

Summary

Information Provided

• The only change identified is: “Removed approximately 75 words from the document.”
• The actual deleted language is not included.
• No additions or replacement text are shown.

Legal Significance

Because the deleted wording is unavailable, it is not possible to determine:

• Whether the deletion changes the parties’ rights or obligations.
• Whether limitations of liability, indemnities, warranties, confidentiality duties, termination rights, or payment terms were affected.
• Whether the deletion narrows or expands the customer’s protections.
• Whether any obligations were removed from the provider.

AI Training and Data Use

The available diff does not identify whether the contract was changed with respect to:

• Using customer data to train, fine-tune, or improve artificial-intelligence or machine-learning models.
• Using customer prompts, inputs, outputs, content, or personal information for model development.
• Whether training use is automatic, optional, or subject to customer consent.
• Whether customer data is anonymized, aggregated, de-identified, or retained.
• Whether the provider may share data with affiliates, vendors, or model providers.
• Whether the customer can opt out of training or request deletion of training data.
• Whether restrictions apply to sensitive, confidential, or personal data.

Risk Assessment

The principal risk is lack of visibility into the deleted language. A deletion could be beneficial—for example, removing a provider’s right to use customer data—or harmful—for example, removing an opt-out, confidentiality protection, deletion obligation, or restriction on AI training.

No reliable conclusion about the effect of the amendment can be made without the approximately 75 deleted words and the surrounding provision.

Recommended Next Step

Obtain the redlined text or the complete “before” and “after” versions, particularly any provisions concerning:

1. Customer data and content;

2. AI or machine-learning training and service improvement;

3. Confidentiality and privacy;

4. Data retention and deletion; and

5. Subprocessors or third-party model providers.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Legal and policy navigation expanded

• The legal links have been reorganized into a Legal Center.
• New or newly displayed links include:
• Terms of Use
• Acceptable Use Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Security Policy
• PGP Key
• This may make additional policies more prominent and potentially easier to incorporate into the overall contractual framework. However, the diff does not show the substance of those policies, so their legal impact cannot be assessed here.

2. Terms now expressly cover trial Services

• The text clarifies that trial accounts for the development platform and related development, hosting, and delivery services are governed by the Terms.
• “Services” is now defined more clearly, rather than referring only generally to the Site.

Data consequence for trials

• The Terms expressly state that any data entered or collected during a Trial will not be stored or available after the Trial ends.
• Customers should assess whether this could result in loss of:
• Integration configurations
• Logs or diagnostic information
• Uploaded business data
• Account or usage data
• The provision does not explain when the Trial ends, whether backups remain temporarily, or whether legal retention obligations override deletion. Those points should be clarified if trial data is important.

3. Privacy and data-processing references

• The Terms now more clearly direct users to the Privacy Policy regarding collection and storage of information.
• The added website notice states that Prismatic uses cookies and similar technologies and processes data under a separate Website Data Collection Policy.
• Users are said to consent to these practices by using the website or providing contact information, subject to preference management.

This appears primarily directed at website and contact information rather than customer Service data. The referenced policies should be reviewed for tracking, analytics, international transfers, retention, and consent mechanisms.

4. AI model training

• No provision in the supplied diff expressly authorizes, restricts, or describes using customer data to train AI models.
• The added marketing/footer references to “AI for Integrations” do not themselves create a data-training right.
• Because the Terms incorporate or reference the Privacy Policy and other policies, any AI-training terms may appear elsewhere. Customers should specifically check those documents for:
• Use of customer content to train or improve models
• Whether data is de-identified or aggregated
• Opt-out rights
• Human review or vendor access
• Retention and deletion rules

5. Other legal changes

• The Terms now state that users consent to updated versions when posted, potentially allowing unilateral changes.
• The disclaimer, liability cap, indemnity, governing-law, and dispute provisions appear substantively unchanged; most edits are formatting, punctuation, navigation, or contact-information updates.
• Contact details now include an email address and telephone number.

Summary of Important Changes

Overall assessment

The diff appears primarily to make formatting, punctuation, and navigation-content changes rather than substantive legal amendments. It does not introduce or remove provisions concerning customer data, artificial intelligence, or training AI models.

Legal and contractual changes

1. No substantive change to Terms of Use identified

The following wording is substantively unchanged:

• The Terms govern use of the Site and trial accounts for the Services.
• Users consent to updated Terms when revised Terms are posted.
• Site content remains Prismatic’s or its licensors’ property.
• The Site is provided “as is” and “as available.”
• Trial data will not be stored or available after the trial ends.
• Liability limitations, indemnification, governing-law, and dispute-resolution provisions remain materially unchanged.

Most edits only remove or normalize punctuation, quotation marks, spacing, and formatting—for example:

• ("Terms") changed to ( Terms )
• “we,” “our” and “us” changed to we, our and us
• Prismatic's changed to Prismatic s
• Section headings and sentences were separated with spaces or periods.

These formatting changes may impair readability and, in some cases, create typographical errors, but they do not appear intended to change legal meaning.

2. Trial-data provision remains important

The existing provision continues to state that:

> Any data entered or collected during a Trial will not be stored or available after the Trial ends.

This remains a significant data-retention term. It does not state:

• Whether data is processed by third-party providers;
• Whether data is used for analytics, product improvement, or security;
• Whether data is used to train or fine-tune AI models; or
• Whether the deletion promise applies to backups, logs, or derived data.

Users should therefore review the Privacy Policy, Website Data Collection Policy, and any separate Services or data-processing agreement for those details.

AI training and customer-data use

No identified change

The diff contains no new or deleted language expressly addressing:

• AI models;
• Machine learning;
• Training, fine-tuning, or evaluation;
• Customer prompts, inputs, outputs, or content;
• Use of customer data to improve products or models; or
• Opt-out, ownership, confidentiality, or deletion rights relating to AI data use.

References to “AI” appear only in website navigation or marketing material and do not create an operative data-use right in the Terms.

Other observations

• The footer and website-navigation content appear to have been substantially reformatted or removed from the displayed text.
• The document continues to identify March 17, 2023 as the update date.
• The removal of apostrophes and quotation marks may be a text-extraction or formatting issue rather than an intended contractual revision.

Summary

The provided diff only states that approximately 39 words were added, but it does not include the actual added language.

Important Changes

• Cannot be determined: The substance of the additions is not provided.
• Legal risks: No new obligations, limitations of liability, permissions, warranties, or other legal risks can be assessed from the information available.
• Customer data: The diff does not show whether the added text changes how customer data may be:
• Used to train, fine-tune, or evaluate AI models;
• Shared with affiliates, vendors, or third parties;
• Retained or deleted;
• De-identified or aggregated;
• Used for product improvement or analytics; or
• Excluded from model training unless the customer opts in.

Information Needed

Please provide the actual 39-word addition, using the stated notation:

• {added text}
• [deleted text]
• [old text]{new text}

Without the underlying language, it is not possible to identify or assess changes relating to AI-model training or other contractual risks.

Summary

The diff states only that approximately 36 words were added, but it does not provide the actual added language.

AI Training and Customer Data

• It is not possible to determine whether the new language:
• Permits or restricts using customer data to train, fine-tune, or improve AI models;
• Allows the provider to use customer inputs, outputs, prompts, files, or usage data for model development;
• Requires customer consent or provides an opt-out;
• Applies anonymization, aggregation, retention, or deletion limits;
• Gives the provider ownership or licensing rights over customer data; or
• Allows disclosure of customer data to affiliates, vendors, or third-party AI providers.

Legal and Commercial Risk

Because the added 36 words are not shown, no reliable assessment can be made of changes to:

• Data ownership and permitted use;
• Confidentiality obligations;
• Privacy and regulatory compliance;
• Security or breach responsibilities;
• Intellectual-property rights;
• Data retention and deletion;
• Liability, indemnity, or warranties; or
• Customer termination or audit rights.

Required Information

Please provide the actual 36-word addition, including any surrounding text if the addition changes an existing sentence. Without the wording, the principal risk is that a potentially broad AI-training or data-use permission may be overlooked.