ProProfs

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual amended contractual language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 135 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to determine:

• What provisions were added or changed;
• Whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, validate, or improve AI models;
• Whether data may be shared with affiliates, vendors, or AI providers;
• Whether customer data is anonymized, aggregated, or retained;
• Whether the customer can opt out of AI training or revoke consent;
• Whether the provider obtains rights to use customer content beyond providing the services;
• Whether confidentiality, security, deletion, or ownership obligations have changed; or
• Whether the customer bears additional regulatory, intellectual-property, or privacy risks.

AI-Training Risk Assessment

No conclusion can be reached regarding AI-model training because the added wording is not provided. The key language to review would include terms such as:

• “train,” “fine-tune,” “improve,” “develop,” or “optimize” models;
• “customer content,” “input,” “output,” “data,” or “usage data”;
• “de-identified,” “anonymized,” or “aggregated” information;
• rights granted to use data “perpetually,” “irrevocably,” or “worldwide”;
• sharing data with subprocessors or third-party model providers; and
• customer opt-out, deletion, retention, or consent mechanisms.

Required Information

Please provide the full redlined text, including the approximately 135 added words and any surrounding language. Once supplied, the changes can be analyzed for:

1. Scope of data-use rights;

2. AI-training permissions and limitations;

3. Ownership and license implications;

4. Confidentiality and privacy exposure;

5. Retention and deletion obligations;

6. Third-party or affiliate access; and

7. Customer approval or opt-out rights.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Tracking and analytics disclosures

• A new link is added for European users (“click here”), apparently in connection with Google cookies and interest-based advertising. The destination and its legal effect are unclear from the diff.
• The notice adds Google’s privacy-partner information link and an opt-out link for Google Analytics.
• The wording indicates that the website uses analytics and crash-reporting services from “several companies,” but the revised text appears incomplete. It should identify the relevant providers and explain what information each receives.
• The notice references the Meta (Facebook) Pixel and retargeting, indicating use of tracking technology for advertising and remarketing. This may create consent, notice, and opt-out obligations, particularly for European users and under U.S. state privacy laws.

2. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The “Used and Shared” section is substantially rewritten. The revised language permits use of information to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalize and customize content;
• Improve the website;
• Contact users about website, product, and service updates;
• Resolve problems and disputes; and
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest to the user.

The prior language appears focused more narrowly on communications and emails. The new wording materially broadens the stated purposes, especially personalization, product improvement, dispute resolution, and marketing.

3. Email and communications

The revision states that the company will use the email address provided during registration when communicating with users. The diff is incomplete and appears to repeat or corrupt portions of the same paragraph. The final policy should clearly specify:

• What communications are mandatory versus promotional;
• Whether users can withdraw marketing consent;
• How unsubscribe requests operate; and
• Whether email addresses are shared with advertising, analytics, or service providers.

4. AI-model training

No express change concerning the use of customer data to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve artificial-intelligence or machine-learning models is shown in this diff. The additions concerning personalization, website improvement, analytics, crash reporting, and advertising do not clearly authorize AI training, although broad “improve” language could potentially be argued to cover internal technology development. A separate, explicit AI-data-use provision would be advisable if customer information may be used for model training.

5. New boilerplate and drafting risks

• A large copyright, trademark, contact-information, and website-links block is added.
• The diff contains duplicated and apparently truncated text, which may make the privacy notice ambiguous or internally inconsistent.
• The company should verify that all links, provider names, opt-out mechanisms, and regional disclosures are accurate before publication.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out rights

The revised text adds:

• A link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A statement that users can prevent Google Analytics from using their information.
• A link to Google’s Analytics opt-out tool:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

Risks and considerations

• The notice now expressly discloses Google’s data processing and provides an opt-out mechanism, which may improve transparency and compliance.
• The text appears duplicated and fragmented across the diff. The final notice should be checked to ensure the disclosure appears only once and is grammatically complete.
• The notice should clarify whether the opt-out applies to all Google Analytics processing, cookies, or only a particular browser/device.
• The reference to “For European users click here” is incomplete in the diff. The destination and purpose of that link should be verified, particularly if it concerns GDPR rights, consent, or cookie controls.

2. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The former wording focused mainly on communications and emails. The revised wording expands the stated purposes to include:

• Providing products and services requested or purchased by customers.
• Personalizing and customizing content.
• Improving the website.
• Contacting users about updates to the website, products, and services.
• Resolving problems and disputes.
• Sending marketing and advertising believed to be of interest to users.

New risks

• The expanded purposes give the company broader discretion to use customer information, especially for personalization, product improvement, marketing, and advertising.
• “Marketing and advertising that we believe may be of interest” is broad and may cover profiling or targeted advertising. The notice should identify the relevant legal basis and any available marketing opt-out.
• The revised language does not clearly distinguish transactional communications from promotional communications.

3. AI-model training

No provision in the supplied diff expressly states that customer data, content, prompts, communications, or other information may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models.

Accordingly, the diff does not appear to add or remove an explicit AI-training right. However, the new broad references to “improvements,” personalization, analytics, and content use should not be interpreted as clear authorization for AI training. If AI training is intended, it should be addressed expressly, including:

• What data may be used;
• Whether data is de-identified or retained;
• Whether third-party AI providers receive the data;
• Whether customers can opt out; and
• Whether customer content is used to train models generally or only to provide the service.

4. Copyright and website footer language

The revision adds extensive copyright, trademark, contact, support, navigation, and “2026 ProProfs” footer language.

Risks

• The copyright statement may restrict copying or redistribution of the privacy notice, which could be unusual and potentially conflict with legal disclosure or accessibility requirements.
• The added footer content appears unrelated to the privacy disclosures and should be reviewed for placement, accuracy, and consistency with the rest of the notice.

Summary

The diff does not include the actual added language. It only states that approximately 135 words were added. As a result, it is not possible to determine:

• Whether the customer’s data may be used to train, fine-tune, validate, or improve AI models.
• Whether such use applies to personal data, confidential information, prompts, outputs, usage data, or customer content.
• Whether the customer must provide consent or may opt out.
• Whether data is anonymized, aggregated, de-identified, or retained.
• Whether the provider may share data with affiliates, subcontractors, or third-party AI providers.
• Whether the provider receives ownership or other rights in customer data or AI-generated outputs.
• Whether any new security, confidentiality, retention, deletion, or regulatory obligations apply.
• Whether the added terms create indemnity, liability, audit, or compliance risks.

Risk Assessment

The addition could materially change the agreement, particularly if it authorizes use of customer data for AI training or product improvement. However, no specific legal risk can be reliably identified without the wording of the 135 added words.

Information Needed

Please provide the actual inserted text, including any surrounding provisions needed to understand its effect. The analysis should then focus especially on:

1. Training rights: Whether customer data or content may be used to train or improve models.

2. Scope of data: Whether the permission covers prompts, outputs, files, personal information, metadata, or usage analytics.

3. Consent and control: Whether use is automatic, optional, or subject to an opt-out.

4. Confidentiality and privacy: Whether data remains confidential and complies with applicable privacy laws.

5. Retention and deletion: How long data is kept and whether it can be removed from training datasets or models.

6. Third-party access: Whether data may be transferred to vendors or model providers.

7. Ownership and liability: Who owns inputs and outputs, and who bears responsibility for infringement, misuse, or regulatory violations.

Summary

The supplied diff does not include the actual amended legal language. It only states that approximately 135 words were added to the document.

Key limitations

• No specific additions, deletions, or replacements are shown.
• It is therefore impossible to determine whether the changes affect:
• Customer data ownership or licensing rights
• Permitted uses of customer data
• Confidentiality or security obligations
• Data retention or deletion
• Disclosure to third parties
• Artificial intelligence or machine-learning training
• Use of customer data to improve products or services
• Opt-out, consent, or notification rights
• Liability, indemnification, or regulatory compliance

AI-training analysis

The provided material contains no language addressing AI models, machine learning, model training, model improvement, prompts, outputs, or the use of customer data for those purposes. No conclusion can be drawn about whether customer data may be used to train AI models.

Needed information

Please provide the actual redlined text, using the stated notation:

• Additions: {new language}
• Deletions: [deleted language]
• Replacements: [old language]{new language}

Without the underlying text, a legal-risk analysis would be speculative.

Key Changes and Legal Risks

1. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The revised language replaces a narrow reference to communications and emails with a substantially broader list of purposes. The company may now use information to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalize and customize content;
• Improve the website;
• Contact users about website, product, and service updates;
• Resolve problems and disputes; and
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest.

Risk: This materially expands the stated purposes for processing personal information, particularly for personalization, product improvement, and direct marketing. The phrase “believe may be of interest to you” is subjective and may permit targeted marketing without clearly stating whether consent is required or how users can opt out.

2. Communications and email language appears reorganized or duplicated

The revised text continues into a more detailed email-communications section, stating that the company will use the email address provided during registration. However, the diff contains repeated and overlapping passages, suggesting the updated notice may be internally inconsistent or improperly formatted.

Risk: Ambiguous or duplicated wording could make it unclear whether emails are limited to transactional communications, include marketing, or are governed by separate consent and opt-out requirements.

3. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out mechanism

New language provides:

• A link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data; and
• A link to the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on.

Risk: This improves transparency but does not itself establish compliance with all applicable privacy laws. The notice should also clearly identify the categories of data collected, purposes, retention, disclosures to Google, and any consent mechanism required for cookies or analytics—particularly for European users.

4. European-user link

The notice adds a “click here” link for European users, but the destination is not shown in the diff.

Risk: The link should lead to a complete, functioning European privacy/cookie rights notice. If it concerns consent, GDPR rights, or withdrawal mechanisms, an unclear or broken link could undermine compliance.

5. Meta Pixel and retargeting

The diff references “Meta (Facebook) Pixel and Retargeting,” apparently identifying Meta tracking technology used to collect website-use information.

Risk: Meta Pixel may involve tracking, profiling, advertising, and transfer of data to Meta. The notice should explain the data collected, purposes, legal basis or consent process, opt-out choices, and applicable international transfers.

6. AI-model training

No language in the provided diff expressly authorizes using customer data to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models. The new references to “personalize and customize our content” and “make improvements to our website” are broad, but they do not clearly state that customer data may be used for AI training.

Risk: If AI training is intended, it should be addressed expressly, including data categories, whether data is de-identified, model providers, retention, opt-out rights, and whether customer content is shared with third-party AI providers.

7. New copyright and website-footer language

A lengthy copyright notice and company footer links/contact information are added.

Risk: The copyright language may restrict copying or redistribution of the privacy notice, but it does not materially change data-processing rights. Ensure it does not conflict with legally required disclosures or user rights.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out information

The revised text adds:

• A link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A link allowing users to opt out of Google Analytics:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

Legal significance: This improves transparency and gives users a practical opt-out mechanism. However, the language should clearly identify all Google services used, the types of data shared, applicable cookies or identifiers, and whether consent is obtained before analytics cookies are placed—particularly for European users.

2. European-user link

The text adds a “click here” link for European users, but the destination is not shown in the diff.

Risk: The link should lead to a clear regional privacy or cookie-consent mechanism. If it relates to GDPR rights or consent preferences, the notice should explain what users can do and whether consent is required for non-essential tracking.

3. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The revised “USED AND SHARED” section replaces a narrower reference to communications and emails with a broader list of purposes, including:

• Providing requested or purchased products and services
• Personalizing and customizing content
• Improving the website
• Contacting users about website, product, and service updates
• Resolving problems and disputes
• Sending marketing and advertising believed to be of interest

Legal significance: This materially expands and clarifies the company’s claimed uses of personal information. Marketing and personalization may require separate consent or an opt-out, depending on the jurisdiction and communication method. The phrase “believe may be of interest” is broad and could support profiling or targeted marketing without explaining the criteria used.

The duplicated and incomplete wording in the diff also suggests the final notice should be checked carefully for clarity and grammatical consistency.

4. AI-model training

No express change regarding AI training was identified. The diff does not add or remove language stating that customer data, content, prompts, communications, or other information may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve artificial-intelligence models.

The added references to “improvements,” “personalize and customize content,” and analytics should not automatically be interpreted as authorization for AI training. If AI training is intended, it should be addressed expressly, including the data categories used, purposes, service providers or model providers receiving the data, retention, opt-out rights, and whether information is de-identified.

5. Copyright and website footer language

New copyright and footer language states that the privacy notice is protected by copyright and prohibits copying, redistribution, use, or publication.

Risk: This is unusual in a privacy notice and may be difficult to enforce against legally required disclosures, regulators, or users exercising privacy rights. It should not be drafted so broadly that it conflicts with statutory rights or required accessibility and compliance uses.

Summary

The provided diff states only that “approximately 135 words” were added. It does not include the actual added language or identify where it appears in the agreement.

Legal and Commercial Impact

Because the text of the additions is missing, it is not possible to determine:

• Whether the customer assumes new obligations or liabilities;
• Whether the provider receives broader rights to use customer data;
• Whether confidentiality, security, or privacy protections have changed;
• Whether intellectual-property ownership or licensing terms have been expanded;
• Whether indemnities, warranties, limitations of liability, or termination rights have changed; or
• Whether the additions create operational, regulatory, or financial risks.

AI-Training and Data-Use Review

No conclusion can be reached about AI-model training from the information supplied. The added language should be checked specifically for terms such as:

• “train,” “fine-tune,” “develop,” or “improve” artificial-intelligence or machine-learning models;
• “inputs,” “outputs,” “customer data,” “usage data,” “de-identified data,” or “aggregated data”;
• Rights to retain, reproduce, analyze, or use data after termination;
• Whether data may be shared with affiliates, subcontractors, or third-party model providers;
• Whether customer data may be used to train general-purpose models or only customer-specific systems;
• Opt-out rights, consent requirements, and deletion obligations; and
• Restrictions or protections for personal, confidential, regulated, or proprietary information.

Information Needed

Please provide the actual 135-word addition, including any surrounding unchanged language and, if applicable, the deleted or replaced wording. Without the text itself, a substantive legal risk analysis is not possible.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out rights

The revised text adds:

• A link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A Google Analytics opt-out link:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

• A “click here” link for European users in the interest-based advertising section.

Risks and implications:

• These additions provide greater transparency and an apparent opt-out mechanism for Google Analytics.
• The wording appears duplicated or incomplete in places, including repeated Google Analytics language and a sentence fragment referring to analytics and crash-reporting companies. This could make the notice unclear or legally unreliable.
• The European-user link is not identified in the diff, so its purpose and effectiveness cannot be confirmed.

2. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The purpose section is substantially rewritten. Instead of primarily referring to communications and emails, it now states that information may be used to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalize and customize content;
• Improve the website;
• Contact users about website, product, and service updates;
• Resolve problems and disputes; and
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest.

Risks and implications:

• The permitted uses are broader and more operationally specific than before.
• Marketing and advertising use is expressly added or clarified. This may require appropriate consent, opt-out mechanisms, or separate disclosures depending on the user’s location and applicable law.
• “Personalize and customize” and “improvements” are broad terms that could allow extensive profiling, analytics, or product-development use.
• The revised language may be difficult to interpret because the diff contains repeated and apparently malformed text, including “Communications and Emails” appearing within the new purpose list.

3. AI model training

No express change regarding AI training was identified.

The diff does not add or remove language stating that customer data, communications, content, prompts, account information, or usage data may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve artificial-intelligence or machine-learning models.

However, the newly added purposes—particularly “improve our website,” “personalize and customize content,” and “products and services”—could be broad enough to invite questions about whether data might be used for AI development. If AI training is intended, it should be addressed expressly, including:

• What categories of data may be used;
• Whether data is de-identified or retained;
• Whether third-party AI providers receive the data;
• Whether users can opt out; and
• Whether customer content is used to train models by default.

4. Copyright and website footer language

New footer language claims copyright protection over the Privacy Notice and prohibits copying, redistribution, use, or publication. It also adds links and contact details.

Risk: The prohibition may be overbroad and could conflict with legally required rights to retain, share, or reproduce privacy notices.

Summary

The diff does not include the actual 135 words added to the document. It only states that approximately 135 words were added.

Legal and Commercial Impact

• Changes cannot be reliably analyzed without the specific added language.
• It is not possible to determine whether the additions:
• Modify the parties’ rights or obligations;
• Expand liability, indemnity, confidentiality, or audit rights;
• Change termination, renewal, payment, or dispute-resolution terms;
• Introduce new warranties, disclaimers, or limitations of liability; or
• Affect ownership or permitted use of data.

AI Training and Customer Data

• The provided diff contains no identifiable language addressing AI, machine learning, model training, data analytics, service improvement, or similar uses.
• Accordingly, it is impossible to determine whether the customer’s data may be:
• Used to train or fine-tune AI models;
• Used to develop, test, or improve products;
• Combined with other customers’ data;
• Retained after termination for model-training purposes; or
• De-identified or anonymized before such use.
• It is also impossible to assess whether the document provides safeguards such as opt-out rights, restrictions on use of confidential or personal data, deletion obligations, or limits on sharing with third-party AI providers.

Required Information

To perform a meaningful legal review, provide the actual added text and, ideally, the surrounding provision or full redline. The analysis should focus particularly on terms such as “customer data,” “content,” “usage data,” “improve,” “develop,” “train,” “fine-tune,” “machine learning,” “artificial intelligence,” “de-identified,” and “aggregated.”

Summary of Important Changes

1. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out information

The revised text adds:

• A link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A link allowing users to opt out of Google Analytics:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

• A reference to Google Analytics in the context of website analytics and crash reporting.

Legal and privacy impact

These additions improve transparency and provide an opt-out mechanism. However:

• The language appears duplicated in multiple places and may be incomplete or grammatically defective.
• The notice should clearly identify which services are used, what information they collect, the purposes of collection, and whether data is transferred to Google.
• The company should verify that the opt-out mechanism works and that the disclosure is consistent with applicable consent requirements, particularly for European users.

2. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The prior wording focused primarily on communications and emails. The replacement substantially expands the listed purposes to include:

• Providing products and services requested or purchased by the customer.
• Personalizing and customizing content.
• Improving the website.
• Contacting users about website, product, and service updates.
• Resolving problems and disputes.
• Sending marketing and advertising believed to be of interest to the user.
• Communicating using the email address provided during registration.

Legal and privacy impact

This is a material expansion of the company’s stated use of personal information. In particular:

• “Personalize and customize content” is broad and may permit profiling or behavioral personalization.
• Marketing and advertising uses should be distinguished from essential service communications.
• Depending on the user’s location, separate consent or an opt-out may be required for marketing emails, targeted advertising, cookies, or profiling.
• The language should identify the legal basis for processing where required, especially for European users.
• The revised wording does not clearly explain whether information is shared with advertising, analytics, or other third-party providers.

3. AI-model training

No express provision concerning AI or the training, fine-tuning, evaluation, or improvement of artificial-intelligence models appears in the diff.

The expanded references to personalization, website improvement, analytics, and crash reporting do not expressly authorize AI training, but their breadth could create ambiguity if the company uses customer content or personal information for those purposes. If AI training is intended, the notice should specifically disclose:

• Whether customer data or submitted content is used to train models.
• Which data categories are used.
• Whether data is de-identified or retained.
• Whether third-party AI providers receive the data.
• Available opt-out, deletion, or objection rights.

4. New copyright and website-footer language

The addition claims copyright protection over the privacy notice and prohibits copying, redistribution, use, or publication. It also adds extensive navigation, contact, support, and trademark information.

This is primarily administrative, but the copying prohibition may be overbroad or difficult to enforce where users need to retain or share the notice for legal, regulatory, or accessibility purposes.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual wording of the approximately 135 added words. It only states that text was added. As a result, it is not possible to assess the legal effect of the changes or identify whether they affect customer-data use, including AI-model training.

AI Training and Data-Use Changes

• No specific language addressing AI, machine learning, model training, automated systems, data mining, or similar practices was provided.
• It cannot be determined whether the new language:
• Permits the provider to use customer data to train or improve AI models;
• Allows use of customer data for product development, analytics, or benchmarking;
• Applies such rights to personal data, confidential information, prompts, outputs, or uploaded content;
• Uses customer data in aggregated, de-identified, or identifiable form;
• Permits sharing of data with affiliates, vendors, or third-party AI providers;
• Gives the customer an opt-out or deletion right; or
• Limits use after termination of the agreement.

Other Legal Risks

Because the added wording is not shown, the following issues also cannot be evaluated:

• Changes to ownership or licensing of customer data;
• New confidentiality exceptions;
• Broader provider rights to retain or disclose information;
• Changes to security, privacy, or regulatory obligations;
• New warranties, indemnities, or liability limitations;
• Changes to termination, deletion, or data-return requirements; and
• Whether the added provisions override existing restrictions elsewhere in the agreement.

Required Information

Please provide the actual 135-word addition and, if applicable, the surrounding or replaced language. The legal impact depends on the precise wording and how it interacts with the agreement’s existing data-use, confidentiality, privacy, and intellectual-property provisions.

Summary

The supplied diff does not include the text of the approximately 135 added words. It only states that words were added.

Legal and Commercial Impact

• Cannot assess substantive changes: Without the actual added language, it is not possible to determine whether the amendment changes liability, confidentiality, data rights, security obligations, intellectual property ownership, termination rights, or other legal terms.
• AI training and data use: The diff does not provide enough information to determine whether customer data may now be:
• Used to train, fine-tune, test, or improve AI models;
• Shared with an AI provider or other third party;
• Retained for model-development purposes after termination;
• Aggregated, anonymized, or de-identified for broader use; or
• Excluded from training subject to an opt-out, enterprise setting, or written agreement.
• Risk assessment unavailable: Any new risks—including possible loss of confidentiality, use of personal information, unclear ownership of model outputs, expanded data licenses, or use of data beyond providing the contracted services—depend on the missing language.

Information Needed

Please provide the actual 135-word addition, with any deletions and replacements shown using the specified notation. The added text should be reviewed together with related provisions concerning:

1. Customer data and permitted processing;

2. Confidentiality and security;

3. Subprocessors and third-party AI providers;

4. Data retention and deletion;

5. Intellectual property and license grants;

6. Privacy-law compliance; and

7. AI training, model improvement, and opt-out rights.

No reliable conclusion about the legal effect of the amendment can be reached from the description alone.

Key Changes and Legal Risks

1. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out information added

The revised text adds:

• A link explaining how Google collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A Google Analytics opt-out link:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

• A reference to European users and a “click here” link, apparently relating to advertising preferences.

Risk: These additions improve transparency, but the wording appears duplicated and technically incomplete in places. The policy should clearly identify all analytics, crash-reporting, advertising, and retargeting providers, explain what data each receives, and ensure all links function properly. The reference to the Meta Pixel and retargeting also suggests tracking for targeted advertising, but the excerpt does not explain the data collected, purposes, retention, or consent mechanism.

2. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The purposes section is substantially expanded. The company now states that it may use information to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalize and customize content;
• Improve the website;
• Send updates about the website, products, and services;
• Resolve problems and disputes; and
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest to the customer.

Risks:

• The purposes are broader than the prior “communications and emails” language.
• “Personalize,” “improve,” and “believe may be of interest” are flexible standards that may permit profiling and targeted marketing.
• The excerpt does not state whether consent is required for marketing, how users can opt out, or whether data is shared with advertising or analytics providers.
• The section heading refers to information being “USED AND SHARED,” but the provided text primarily describes use, not the categories of recipients or sharing arrangements. This could create a disclosure gap under privacy laws.

3. No express AI-model training language identified

The diff contains no express provision authorizing, prohibiting, or describing the use of customer data to train artificial intelligence or machine-learning models.

Accordingly, the revised language does not clearly say whether customer data, communications, uploaded content, or usage information may be:

• Used to train the company’s or a third party’s AI models;
• Used to improve automated systems;
• De-identified before such use; or
• Shared with AI vendors for training or model development.

If AI training is intended, a separate, clear disclosure should address the data involved, purpose, vendors, opt-out rights, retention, and whether content is used to train general-purpose models.

Diff Analysis

Available Information

The supplied diff states only:

> “Added approximately 135 words to the document”

It does not include the actual added language, deleted language, or replacement text.

Legal and AI-Training Implications

Because the substantive wording is missing, it is not possible to determine whether the changes:

• Permit the provider to use customer data, content, prompts, outputs, or metadata to train or improve AI models;
• Expand existing rights to use customer data for product development, analytics, benchmarking, or machine learning;
• Apply AI-training rights to identifiable, confidential, regulated, or personal data;
• Make AI-training use automatic, optional, or subject to customer consent or opt-out;
• Allow data to be shared with affiliates, vendors, subprocessors, or third-party model providers;
• Permit retention of data after termination or deletion;
• Change ownership or licensing rights in customer content or AI-generated outputs;
• Limit the provider’s confidentiality, security, deletion, or data-protection obligations; or
• Create compliance risks under privacy, confidentiality, intellectual-property, or sector-specific laws.

Risk Assessment

No reliable legal risk assessment can be made from the information provided. The statement that approximately 135 words were added does not reveal whether the changes are substantive, merely explanatory, or materially unfavorable to the customer.

Information Needed

Please provide the actual diff, including:

• Added text in {braces};
• Deleted text in [brackets]; and
• Replacement text in []{braces} format.

The analysis can then identify the precise changes, explain their practical effect, and specifically assess any rights to use customer data for AI model training or improvement.

The publisher records this document as revised on this date (“Effective Date: June 25, 2026”).

Important Changes Summary

1. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The revised language replaces a narrower reference to “Communications and Emails” with a broader list of purposes. The company states it may use information to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalize and customize content;
• Improve the website;
• Contact users about website, product, and service updates;
• Resolve problems and disputes; and
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest.

Legal and privacy risks

• Broader permitted use: The new wording significantly expands the stated purposes for processing customer data beyond communications about the website.
• Personalization and marketing: “Personalize and customize content” and interest-based marketing may involve profiling or targeted advertising. The language does not explain what data is used, how profiling works, or how users can object.
• Subjective marketing standard: Marketing may be sent where the company “believe[s]” it may interest the user, which is broad and does not establish clear consent requirements or opt-out procedures.
• Potential regulatory considerations: Depending on the customer’s location and the data involved, these activities may trigger consent, notice, opt-out, or “sale/share” requirements under laws such as the GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, or e-privacy rules.

2. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out information added

The revised text adds:

• A link describing how Google collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A Google Analytics opt-out link:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

This appears in connection with Google Analytics and analytics/crash-reporting services.

Legal and operational risks

• The notice gives users a clearer opt-out mechanism, which is beneficial for transparency.
• However, the diff appears to contain duplicated or fragmented text. The final notice should be checked to ensure the Google disclosures are complete, readable, and placed in the correct section.
• The language does not specify what identifiers, device information, or analytics data are collected, whether data is shared with Google for advertising, or whether consent is obtained before tracking.

3. Meta Pixel and retargeting reference

The diff includes a reference to Meta (Facebook) Pixel and Retargeting and a European-user link, but the surrounding text appears incomplete.

Risk

The notice may not adequately explain Meta’s collection, use, or sharing of browsing data for advertising and retargeting. The final wording should identify the data involved, the purposes, the legal basis or consent mechanism, and available objection or opt-out rights.

4. AI-model training

No express change concerning the use of customer data to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models appears in this diff. The expanded references to personalization, content improvement, analytics, and website improvement do not clearly authorize AI training, but they are broad enough that ambiguity could create interpretive risk. If AI training is intended, it should be addressed expressly, including data categories, purposes, retention, safeguards, and user choices.

5. Copyright and website-footer language added

New language claims copyright protection over the privacy notice and prohibits copying, redistribution, use, or publication. It also adds extensive footer links and contact information.

Risk

The copyright restriction is unusual for a privacy notice and may be difficult to enforce against legally required disclosures, regulatory submissions, or accessibility and compliance uses.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual contractual language that was added, deleted, or replaced. It only states:

> “Added approximately 135 words to the document”

Accordingly, the legal effect of the changes cannot be analyzed reliably.

AI Training and Customer Data

• No clause or wording concerning the use of customer data to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models is included.
• It is therefore not possible to determine whether the changes:
• Permit or prohibit AI training using customer data;
• Expand the definition of data that may be used;
• Allow use of data in aggregated, de-identified, or identifiable form;
• Permit sharing with affiliates, vendors, or model providers;
• Create an opt-out or deletion right;
• Address ownership of inputs, outputs, or derived models; or
• Impose confidentiality, security, or retention limits.

Risk Assessment

Because the substantive text is missing, no specific new contractual risks can be identified. In particular, it would be premature to conclude that customer data is protected from AI training or, conversely, that the customer has granted permission for such use.

Information Needed

Please provide the actual diff showing the added, deleted, and replaced language—for example:

• Additions in {curly braces};
• Deletions in [square brackets]; and
• Replacements in the format [{deleted text}]{new text}.

Once the substantive wording is provided, the changes can be assessed for legal effect, including any permissions to use customer data for AI model training.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out information

The revisions add:

• A link explaining how Google collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A Google Analytics opt-out link:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

• A reference to Google Analytics in connection with website analytics and crash-reporting services.

Risk/impact: These additions improve transparency and provide users with an opt-out mechanism. However, the language appears duplicated and fragmented in the diff, so the final notice should be reviewed to ensure the disclosure is accurate, readable, and placed in the correct section. The notice should also identify all relevant analytics or crash-reporting providers and explain what data they collect.

2. Meta Pixel and retargeting

The revised text adds or introduces a heading for “Meta (Facebook) Pixel and Retargeting.” The surrounding text indicates that the website uses cookies or similar identifiers to collect information about website use.

Risk/impact: Meta Pixel and retargeting can involve sharing identifiers, browsing activity, conversion events, and potentially customer information with Meta for advertising and measurement. The notice should clearly state:

• What information is sent to Meta;
• The purposes of the sharing, including targeted advertising and retargeting;
• Whether Meta acts as an independent controller or service provider;
• How users can opt out of targeted advertising or manage cookies; and
• Whether consent is required before placing or activating the Pixel, particularly for users in the European Economic Area, the United Kingdom, or other jurisdictions requiring consent.

The addition of “For European users click here” should contain a functioning and clearly identified link. A generic reference may not be sufficient for privacy-law compliance.

3. Expanded uses of customer information

The “USED AND SHARED” section is substantially expanded. The company now states that it may use information to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalize and customize content;
• Improve the website;
• Send updates about the website, products, and services;
• Resolve problems and disputes; and
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest to the user.

The communications section also clarifies that the email address supplied during registration may be used for communications.

Risk/impact: The expanded purposes broaden the company’s permitted use of customer data, especially for personalization, product improvement, marketing, and advertising. The language “believe may be of interest to you” is broad and may permit promotional communications beyond transactional messages. The notice should explain marketing opt-out rights and distinguish service communications from promotional communications.

4. AI-model training

No express change addressing AI, machine learning, or training models appears in the supplied diff. The revisions do not state whether customer data, prompts, content, communications, or usage data may be used to train or improve AI models.

If AI training is intended, the notice should expressly address the categories of data used, purposes, providers receiving the data, retention, opt-out rights, and whether data is de-identified or aggregated.