ProProfs

Summary of Important Changes

1. Data processing and subprocessors

• The Data Processing Addendum (DPA) is now expressly available by contacting privacy@proprofs.com. The DPA is stated to govern the Company’s processing of personal data on the customer’s behalf.
• A current list of third-party subprocessors is available upon request by contacting support@proprofs.com.
• The Company will provide 30 days’ advance notice of material additions or changes to subprocessors that process personal data.
• Enterprise customers may object to new subprocessors during the notice period by contacting privacy@proprofs.com.

Risks and implications

• The DPA is not included in the revised text and must be requested separately. Customers should obtain and review it before providing personal data.
• The objection right appears limited to enterprise customers and to new subprocessors, not necessarily all changes or all customers.
• The term “material” may create uncertainty about which subprocessor changes trigger notice.
• The diff appears to contain repeated and partially reordered language, so the final published version should be checked to ensure the notice and subprocessor provisions are coherent and enforceable.

2. AI model training and use of customer data

• No express change concerning AI training, machine learning, model development, or use of customer data to train AI models appears in the supplied diff.
• The revised language does not grant or revoke an express right to use customer content, personal data, prompts, responses, or other service data for AI training.
• Customers should therefore review the unchanged portions of the Agreement, Privacy Policy, DPA, and any product-specific AI terms for existing training rights. The absence of a change here should not be treated as a prohibition on AI training.

3. Notices and legal communications

• Notices to the Company generally must be sent to support@proprofs.com, unless the Agreement specifies otherwise.
• Subprocessor objections are directed to privacy@proprofs.com.
• Notices to customers may be sent by email to the email address associated with the account.
• Electronic notices have the same legal effect as paper notices.
• The revised text retains delivery methods including personal delivery, email, certified mail, and overnight carrier delivery with verification of receipt.

Risks and implications

• Customers are responsible for keeping their account email address current.
• Important legal notices may become effective through email, potentially without actual reading by the customer.
• The repeated and fragmented edits create drafting ambiguity; the final Agreement should be reviewed for duplicated clauses, incorrect section references, and inconsistent notice procedures.

4. Additional contact and enforcement provisions

• A company telephone number was added.
• A support email was added for cancellation assistance and reporting prohibited content.
• A DMCA infringement-notice email address was added.
• Arbitration-related notices of dispute are directed to support@proprofs.com.

Summary of Important Changes

1. New Privacy Contact Information

• Adds privacy@proprofs.com to the company’s address.
• This makes it easier for users to submit privacy-related questions or requests.
• No material change to user rights or request procedures is shown.

2. Google Analytics Disclosure and Opt-Out

The notice adds:

• A link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A link allowing users to opt out of Google Analytics:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

Risk/impact

• This provides greater transparency regarding third-party analytics.
• It confirms that Google may process website-use information under its own privacy practices.
• The notice should clearly identify what data is shared with Google, the applicable legal basis, and whether the opt-out applies to all analytics technologies. The diff appears to contain duplicated or awkwardly inserted Analytics language, which may create ambiguity.

3. Expanded and Reorganized Purposes for Using Personal Information

The prior wording concerning “Communications” and emails is replaced with broader purposes, including:

• Providing products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalizing and customizing content;
• Improving the website;
• Contacting users about updates to the website, products, and services;
• Resolving problems and disputes; and
• Sending marketing and advertising believed to be of interest.

The notice also retains language stating that the company will use the email address supplied during registration when communicating with users.

Risk/impact

• The purposes are substantially broader and more detailed than the prior “communications” wording.
• “Personalize and customize,” “improve,” and “marketing and advertising” may permit wider use of customer information, including potentially for profiling or targeted marketing.
• The language does not specify consent requirements, opt-out rights, retention periods, or whether marketing communications are based on legitimate interests or consent.
• “Products and services” could encompass future offerings unless otherwise limited.

4. AI Model Training

• No express change concerning the use of customer data to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve artificial-intelligence or machine-learning models is shown in this diff.
• The new language authorizes personalization, website improvement, and product/service improvement in general terms, but it does not expressly state that customer data may be used for AI training.
• Because “improve our website” and similar wording can be interpreted broadly, the company should expressly clarify whether customer content or personal information is used for AI development, whether it is de-identified, whether providers may use it to train models, and whether customers can opt out.

5. New Copyright and Website Footer Language

• Adds a copyright notice claiming protection of the Privacy Notice.
• Adds navigation links, contact details, support information, and references to GDPR/CCPA, accessibility, trademarks, cookie preferences, and sitemap.

Risk/impact

• The copyright language may discourage copying or redistribution but does not itself change privacy obligations.
• The added GDPR/CCPA reference should correspond to actual, accessible rights notices and procedures.

Summary

The supplied diff does not include the actual added, deleted, or replacement language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 137 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to determine what contractual terms changed or whether the customer’s data may be used to train AI models.

AI-Training and Data-Use Review

No conclusions can be drawn about whether the revised terms:

• Permit the provider to use customer data, inputs, outputs, or content to train, fine-tune, or improve AI models;
• Apply such use by default or only if the customer opts in;
• Distinguish between personal data, confidential information, prompts, outputs, and de-identified or aggregated data;
• Allow human review or use of customer data for safety, monitoring, or product development;
• Restrict use of data after termination or deletion;
• Apply different rules to enterprise customers, free users, or specific services; or
• Give the provider rights to use data shared with affiliates, subcontractors, or model providers.

Potential Risks Requiring Review

The missing text should be checked for:

1. Broad data licenses — rights to reproduce, modify, analyze, distribute, or create derivative works from customer content.

2. AI-training permissions — express or implied rights to use customer data to train or improve models.

3. Confidentiality conflicts — permission to use confidential information in ways inconsistent with confidentiality obligations.

4. Insufficient de-identification standards — vague promises to use “aggregated” or “anonymized” data without defining the process.

5. Retention and deletion — continued use or retention of data after account termination or deletion requests.

6. Third-party disclosures — sharing data with vendors or model providers without equivalent restrictions.

7. Opt-out limitations — opt-out rights that are unavailable, prospective only, or limited to certain products.

Information Needed

Please provide the actual 137 words added, together with any deleted or replaced language. Without the substantive diff, no reliable legal-risk or AI-data-use analysis can be performed.

Summary

The supplied diff does not include the actual added, deleted, or replaced contractual language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 137 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to identify the legal effect of the changes or assess whether they create new risks.

AI Training and Customer Data

No substantive language addressing any of the following is provided:

• Whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, or improve AI models
• Whether prompts, inputs, outputs, or usage data may be retained
• Whether data is used for product development, analytics, or research
• Whether customer data is anonymized, aggregated, or shared with third parties
• Whether the customer can opt out of AI training or data-use practices
• Ownership or licensing rights in customer data, inputs, or outputs
• Security, confidentiality, deletion, or retention obligations relating to AI systems

Therefore, no conclusion can be reached about changes to AI training rights or the use of customer data.

Information Needed

Please provide the actual 137-word addition and any associated deletions or replacements, using the stated notation:

• {added text}
• [deleted text]
• []{replacement text}

Once the substantive diff is provided, it can be reviewed for changes to data rights, AI training permissions, confidentiality, ownership, liability, and termination obligations.

Summary of Important Changes

1. New Privacy Contact Information

• Adds privacy@proprofs.com as a privacy-related contact email.
• This may make it easier for customers to submit privacy inquiries or rights requests, although the notice should clearly explain the types of requests accepted through that address.

2. Google Analytics Disclosure and Opt-Out

The revised language adds:

• A link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A link allowing users to opt out of Google Analytics:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

Risk/impact

• This provides greater transparency and an opt-out mechanism for analytics tracking.
• The diff appears to contain duplicated or partially repeated Google Analytics language. The final notice should be checked for formatting errors, repeated sections, and whether the links are correctly embedded.

3. Expanded Uses of Customer Information

The “Used and Shared” section is substantially expanded. The revised purposes include using information to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased by users.
• Personalize and customize content.
• Improve the website, products, and services.
• Contact users about updates.
• Resolve problems and disputes.
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest to users.
• Communicate with users using their registered email address.

Risk/impact

• The new language is broader than a simple “communications and emails” purpose.
• It expressly authorizes personalization, product improvement, marketing, advertising, and dispute resolution.
• “Marketing and advertising that we believe may be of interest” is subjective and may permit targeted communications unless users have a clear opt-out.
• The wording should distinguish service-related communications from promotional communications and identify applicable consent or opt-out rights.

4. Copyright and Website Footer Language

Adds a broad copyright and website-footer block stating that:

• The privacy notice is protected by U.S. and foreign copyrights.
• Copying, redistribution, use, or publication is prohibited.
• Various links and contact details are included, including Terms, Privacy, GDPR/CCPA, Cookie Preferences, and accessibility links.

Risk/impact

• The copyright restriction may be overbroad as applied to legally permitted copying, regulatory use, or user rights requests.
• The footer should be reviewed to ensure all referenced policies and links exist and are current.

5. AI Training or Model Development

• No express change addresses the use of customer data to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or develop AI models.
• The expanded purposes—particularly “improve” and “personalize”—could potentially be interpreted broadly, but they do not clearly authorize AI training.
• If customer data may be used for AI training, the notice should state this expressly, identify the data involved, purposes, recipients, retention, opt-out choices, and whether data is de-identified or shared with AI providers.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual added or deleted contract language. It only states that approximately 137 words were added. As a result, it is not possible to identify:

• Changes to the parties’ rights or obligations
• New liability, indemnity, confidentiality, or termination risks
• Changes to data ownership or permitted data uses
• Whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, validate, or improve AI models
• Any restrictions, consent requirements, opt-out rights, or deletion obligations related to AI training

AI-Training Review

No specific language addressing AI models or training is included in the diff provided. The key provisions that should be reviewed in the missing text include whether the provider may:

• Use customer data, prompts, inputs, outputs, or usage data to train or improve models
• Share customer data with affiliates, vendors, or third-party model providers
• Use de-identified, aggregated, or pseudonymized data for model development
• Retain data for training after termination or deletion requests
• Claim ownership or broad license rights over customer inputs or outputs
• Make AI training use automatic unless the customer opts out
• Use customer data for human review, safety testing, analytics, or benchmarking

Conclusion

A substantive legal analysis cannot be completed without the actual redline language. Please provide the 137 added words and any surrounding provisions, using the specified notation for additions, deletions, and replacements.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Contact Information Added

• Adds privacy@proprofs.com to the company’s Santa Monica address.
• Risk/impact: This improves transparency and gives individuals a direct privacy contact. The company should ensure the mailbox is monitored and capable of handling privacy requests.

2. Google Analytics Disclosure and Opt-Out Information

The revised language adds:

• A link explaining how Google collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A Google Analytics opt-out link:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

The changes appear more than once in the diff, which may indicate duplicate or poorly integrated text.

• Risk/impact: The notice more clearly identifies Google’s role and provides an opt-out mechanism. However, the final document should avoid duplication and should accurately describe whether Google Analytics, advertising features, cookies, or crash-reporting tools are actually used.
• The existing reference to European users and “click here” should be checked to ensure the link is present and functional.

3. Expanded Purposes for Using Personal Information

The previous wording generally referred to communications and emails. The replacement substantially expands the stated purposes to include:

• Providing products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalizing and customizing content;
• Improving the website;
• Contacting users about website, product, and service updates;
• Resolving problems and disputes; and
• Sending marketing and advertising believed to be of interest.

The revised email language also clarifies that the company will use the email address supplied during registration.

• Risk/impact: This is a material expansion and clarification of permitted uses. In particular, personalization, product improvement, and marketing may support profiling or targeted advertising. Depending on the user’s location, separate consent, opt-out rights, or “Do Not Sell/Share” disclosures may be required. The company should identify the legal basis for marketing and explain how users can unsubscribe.

4. AI Training and Model Use

• No express language in the supplied diff authorizes, prohibits, or addresses using customer data to train artificial-intelligence or machine-learning models.
• There is also no clear statement regarding:
• Whether customer content is submitted to third-party AI providers;
• Whether inputs or outputs are retained;
• Whether data is used to improve or train models;
• Whether training is opt-in, opt-out, or prohibited; or
• Whether customer data is de-identified before such use.

Risk/impact: If the company uses customer content or personal information for AI training, the revised notice does not clearly disclose that practice. This could create transparency, consent, contractual, and data-protection risks. A specific AI-data-use provision should be added if such processing occurs.

5. Copyright and Website Boilerplate Added

Adds copyright restrictions covering copying, redistribution, use, or publication of the privacy notice, along with navigation links, support contacts, and references to Terms, Privacy, Accessibility, GDPR/CCPA, trademarks, cookies, and sitemap pages.

• Risk/impact: The copyright statement does not materially change data-processing rights, but it should not restrict legally permitted copying or regulatory use of the notice. The added links and contact details should be verified.

Key Changes and Risks

1. No express AI-training provision identified

• The diff does not add or modify language stating that customer data, user content, prompts, account information, or other personal information may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve artificial-intelligence models.
• It also does not state that customer data will not be used for AI training.
• Accordingly, the changes provide no additional contractual protection or transparency regarding AI-model training. Any such use would need to be assessed under the unchanged portions of the privacy notice, including general provisions concerning service improvement, personalization, analytics, or vendors.

2. Expanded statement of business purposes

The purposes for using information are substantially expanded. The revised language states that information may be used to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalize and customize content;
• Improve the website;
• Contact users regarding website, product, and service updates;
• Resolve problems and disputes; and
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest.

Risk

These purposes are materially broader and more specific than the prior “communications/emails” wording. “Personalize,” “improve,” and “marketing and advertising” may permit broader profiling, product-improvement, and promotional uses. The language does not clearly distinguish:

• Service-related communications from marketing;
• Necessary processing from optional processing;
• Direct marketing from targeted or behavioral advertising; or
• Whether user-generated content or customer data is included in “information.”

The phrase “believe may be of interest” is subjective and may create uncertainty about the basis for marketing communications and personalization.

3. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out information

The revision adds:

• A link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data; and
• A Google Analytics opt-out link.

Risk

This improves transparency and gives users an opt-out mechanism, but it also confirms reliance on Google Analytics and related tracking or crash-reporting providers. The diff appears to contain duplicated or awkwardly inserted Google Analytics language, which could make the notice unclear or technically inaccurate. The notice should identify, consistently and precisely:

• Which Google services are used;
• What data is shared;
• Whether cookies, identifiers, or cross-site tracking are involved; and
• How the opt-out interacts with the site’s cookie controls.

4. New contact and footer provisions

• A privacy contact email address is added: privacy@proprofs.com.
• A substantial copyright and website-footer block is added, including links, contact details, and a stated copyright restriction.

Risk

The copyright language is not a privacy term and may be inappropriate or confusing within the privacy notice. It also states that copying, redistribution, use, or publication is strictly prohibited, which could conflict with legally permitted copying, regulatory requirements, or users’ ability to retain notice records.

Overall assessment

The principal substantive change is the expansion of permitted data uses and the addition of Google Analytics transparency/opt-out information. No explicit AI-training authorization or prohibition appears in the diff.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual amended contract language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 137 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to determine what terms changed or whether the additions create new legal or commercial risks.

AI Training and Customer Data

No substantive language concerning any of the following was provided:

• Use of customer data to train, fine-tune, or improve AI or machine-learning models
• Whether customer content is used for model training by default or only with consent
• Use of de-identified, aggregated, or anonymized customer data
• Human review or labeling of customer data
• Retention or deletion of data used for training
• Restrictions on using confidential, personal, regulated, or proprietary information
• Ownership of model outputs or intellectual property created through training
• Opt-out rights, administrative controls, or limitations on secondary use
• Disclosure of AI subprocessors or third-party model providers

Therefore, no conclusion can be reached about whether the contract expands the provider’s rights to use customer data for AI training.

Risk Assessment

The change cannot be legally assessed without the actual inserted language. The statement that approximately 137 words were added does not identify:

• The affected section or clause
• Whether existing language was modified or supplemented
• New permissions, obligations, warranties, or limitations
• Any changes to liability, confidentiality, privacy, security, or data ownership

Information Needed

Please provide the full diff using the specified notation:

• Additions: {new text}
• Deletions: [deleted text]
• Replacements: [old text]{new text}

The actual wording is necessary to identify material changes, particularly any provision authorizing the use of customer data to train, improve, evaluate, or develop AI models.

Key Changes and Risks

1. Session recording and behavioral analytics replaced by SMS disclosures

The amendment removes disclosures about session-recording and behavioral-analytics tools and replaces them with a detailed SMS/text-messaging section. The new section states that the company may:

• Send service and, with legally required consent, promotional text messages.
• Retain phone numbers, message content, opt-in/opt-out choices, consent records, and related timestamps.
• Share this information with mobile carriers, messaging aggregators, and service providers as necessary to send messages and comply with carrier requirements.
• Use providers such as Hotjar and Qualaroo for website analytics and session recording.

Risk: The new wording significantly expands the privacy notice’s treatment of mobile information and communications. It should clearly distinguish transactional from promotional messages and identify the legal basis and consent process for each.

2. New restrictions on mobile-data sharing

The revised language states that, notwithstanding other provisions, mobile information—including phone numbers, text-message opt-in data, and consent—will not be shared with third parties or affiliates for their marketing or promotional purposes.

This is a meaningful protective commitment. However, it is limited by the separate authorization to share information with carriers, aggregators, and service providers for message delivery and compliance.

Risk: The terms should clarify whether service providers may use the data for their own purposes, how long data is retained, and whether “mobile information” includes message content and metadata.

3. New SMS opt-out and sender provisions

The revision adds:

• “Reply STOP to opt out or HELP for help.”
• A warning that message and data rates may apply.
• A statement that businesses using the services are the message senders and are responsible for obtaining consent.
• A reference to an SMS Communications Addendum.

Risk: Assigning consent responsibility to customer businesses may create contractual ambiguity. The agreement should specify each party’s compliance obligations under TCPA, CTIA rules, and applicable state and international laws, including recordkeeping and opt-out processing.

4. Expanded advertising and tracking disclosures

The revised text adds or relocates disclosures concerning:

• Google advertising cookies and interest-based advertising.
• Meta Pixel and retargeting on Facebook, Instagram, and other Meta platforms.
• Session recording and behavioral analytics.
• Google Analytics, including collection of demographics, interests, visit frequency, pages visited, referring websites, IP addresses, and identifiers.

Some prior limitations—such as statements that analytics data was not combined with identifying information—appear to be removed or replaced with broader tracking language.

Risk: The new wording may permit broader profiling and targeted advertising. Consent, cookie controls, “Do Not Track” treatment, international transfers, and vendor disclosures should be reviewed for regulatory compliance.

5. AI-model training

No express change concerning the use of customer data to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models appears in this diff. The revised language does not grant or remove an AI-training license.

Nevertheless, the new references to analyzing behavioral data, message content, analytics information, and service improvement are broad. They should not be interpreted as authorizing AI training unless that use is stated expressly elsewhere.

Summary

Information Provided

The diff contains only the notation:

> “Added approximately 211 words to the document”

No actual added, deleted, or replaced contractual language is included.

Legal and Commercial Impact

The substantive changes cannot be analyzed without the text of the 211 added words and the surrounding provisions. In particular, it is not possible to determine whether the additions:

• Expand or restrict the customer’s rights;
• Change confidentiality, security, ownership, or licensing terms;
• Add warranties, disclaimers, indemnities, or liability limits;
• Permit data sharing with affiliates, vendors, or other third parties;
• Change termination, retention, deletion, or audit rights; or
• Modify governing law, dispute resolution, or compliance obligations.

AI Training and Data Use

The provided diff does not reveal whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, test, or improve artificial-intelligence or machine-learning models.

The missing language should be reviewed specifically for terms such as:

• “Train,” “fine-tune,” “improve,” “develop,” or “enhance” models;
• “Product improvement,” “service improvement,” or “analytics”;
• Customer content, inputs, outputs, prompts, usage data, or telemetry;
• Aggregated, de-identified, anonymized, or derived data;
• Rights granted to use data after termination;
• Opt-out, consent, or customer-control mechanisms;
• Human review or access to customer data; and
• Whether data may be shared with model providers or subprocessors.

Risk Assessment

No reliable risk assessment can be made from the information supplied. A statement that approximately 211 words were added does not identify the legal effect of those additions.

Please provide the actual redlined text, including the relevant surrounding provisions, for a meaningful analysis.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual added contractual language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 135 words to the document”

Because the new wording is not shown, it is not possible to determine:

• What contractual terms changed;
• Whether any new obligations, rights, limitations, or liabilities were added;
• Whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models;
• Whether data may be shared with affiliates, vendors, or third parties;
• Whether customer data is anonymized, de-identified, aggregated, or retained;
• Whether the customer can opt out of AI training or revoke consent;
• Whether the provider may use prompts, outputs, metadata, or usage data for model development; or
• Whether confidentiality, security, deletion, ownership, or indemnity protections were modified.

AI-Training Risk Assessment

No conclusion can be reached regarding AI-model training because the relevant contractual text is missing. The added language should be reviewed for terms such as:

• “train,” “fine-tune,” “improve,” “develop,” or “enhance” models;
• “inputs,” “outputs,” “customer content,” “usage data,” or “telemetry”;
• Rights granted on a “perpetual,” “irrevocable,” “worldwide,” or “royalty-free” basis;
• Use by the provider’s affiliates, contractors, or third-party model providers;
• Exceptions for “de-identified,” “aggregated,” or “anonymized” information;
• Opt-out mechanisms or settings;
• Data retention and deletion periods; and
• Restrictions on using confidential, personal, regulated, or sensitive information.

Required Information

Please provide the actual 135-word addition, using the stated notation for additions, deletions, and replacements. Without the text itself, a substantive legal-risk analysis would be speculative.

Key Changes

1. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The “Used and Shared” section changes from a narrower reference to communications and emails to a broader list of purposes, including:

• Providing products and services requested or purchased
• Personalizing and customizing content
• Improving the website
• Sending updates about the website, products, and services
• Resolving problems and disputes
• Sending marketing and advertising believed to be of interest to the customer

Risk: This gives the company broader discretion to use customer information for personalization, product improvement, communications, and targeted marketing. The phrase “we believe may be of interest to you” is subjective and does not clearly limit the scope of marketing or explain whether consent is required.

2. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out information

The diff adds language stating that Google collects and processes data under Google’s privacy policies and provides:

• A link to Google’s partner privacy information
• A Google Analytics opt-out link

Risk: This improves transparency and gives users an opt-out mechanism, but it also confirms that website data may be shared with Google for analytics and related processing. The repeated or duplicated wording in the diff should be checked before publication to ensure the final notice is clear and accurate.

3. Meta Pixel and retargeting

The diff references the use of the Meta (Facebook) Pixel and retargeting, apparently for collecting information about website use.

Risk: Meta Pixel and retargeting can involve tracking identifiers, website activity, and advertising-related sharing with Meta. The notice should clearly explain what data is collected, the purposes of sharing, applicable consent requirements, and how users can opt out. The excerpt appears incomplete, so the exact change should be verified.

4. AI-model training

No express change concerning AI training was identified. The diff does not state that customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve artificial-intelligence or machine-learning models. It also does not expressly prohibit such use.

If AI training is intended, the policy should address:

• Whether customer content or personal information is used
• Whether data is de-identified or aggregated
• Whether third-party AI providers receive the data
• Whether customers can opt out
• Retention, security, and deletion practices

5. New copyright and website footer language

The addition includes copyright-protection language and extensive company links, contact details, support information, and a reference to a 2026 date.

Risk: The copyright language may be overly broad or operationally unnecessary in a privacy notice. The 2026 reference and contact details should be confirmed as current and accurate.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The privacy notice changes the stated uses of information from a narrow reference to “Communications” and emails about the website to a substantially broader list. The company now says it may use information to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalize and customize content;
• Improve the website;
• Contact users about website, product, and service updates;
• Resolve problems and disputes; and
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest.

Risk: The new language broadens the company’s claimed purposes for processing personal information, particularly for personalization, product improvement, marketing, and advertising. “Believe may be of interest” is subjective and does not clearly describe targeting criteria, consent requirements, or opt-out rights.

2. More detail about email communications

The revised language clarifies that the company uses the email address supplied during registration when communicating with users.

Risk: This may confirm use of registration information for communications beyond strictly transactional messages. The excerpt does not distinguish between essential service communications and marketing communications, or explain whether users can unsubscribe from each category.

3. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out information

The additions provide links to:

• Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data; and
• Google’s Analytics opt-out tool.

The language also appears more than once and is grammatically or structurally incomplete in the supplied diff.

Risk: This improves transparency and provides an opt-out mechanism, but it does not itself limit data collection, identify the specific data shared with Google, or explain retention, cross-border transfers, or whether other analytics and crash-reporting providers receive similar information.

4. Meta Pixel and retargeting reference

The diff adds or completes a reference to the Meta Pixel and retargeting, and adds a “click here” link for European users in connection with Google cookies for interest-based advertising.

Risk: Meta Pixel and retargeting may involve sharing identifiers, browsing activity, and potentially conversion or interest data with Meta for advertising. The excerpt does not state the legal basis, consent mechanism, data categories, retention period, or how users can opt out. The European-user link should clearly lead to a valid and relevant control or notice.

5. AI-model training

No express change regarding AI training is visible in this diff. The additions do not state that customer data will—or will not—be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve artificial-intelligence models. They also do not address whether data is shared with AI service providers or whether users can opt out.

6. Copyright and website footer language

New boilerplate claims copyright protection over the privacy notice and prohibits copying, redistribution, use, or publication. It also adds links and contact details, including GDPR/CCPA and cookie-preference references.

Risk: The copyright restriction may be overbroad as applied to legally required disclosures, accessibility, regulatory review, or user rights. The added footer also appears unrelated to data practices and may create formatting or accuracy issues if not properly integrated.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual added, deleted, or replaced legal language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 135 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to determine:

• What contractual provisions changed;
• Whether customer rights or obligations were expanded;
• Whether liability, confidentiality, security, or indemnity terms changed;
• Whether data may be shared with affiliates or third parties;
• Whether the provider may use customer data to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models;
• Whether customer data will be anonymized, aggregated, de-identified, or retained;
• Whether the customer can opt out of AI training or revoke consent; or
• Whether any new data-processing, intellectual-property, or regulatory risks were introduced.

AI Training and Data-Use Risks

No conclusion can be reached regarding AI-model training because the added wording is not provided. The most important provisions to review would be language addressing whether the provider may:

1. Use customer content, prompts, outputs, or usage data to train or improve models;

2. Use data for “service improvement,” “research,” analytics, or product development;

3. Combine customer data with other customers’ data;

4. Share data with subcontractors, cloud providers, or model providers;

5. Retain data after termination;

6. Use de-identified or aggregated data without customer approval; or

7. Permit human review of customer content.

Particular risk terms include broad rights such as “perpetual,” “irrevocable,” “worldwide,” “royalty-free,” or “for any business purpose.” The absence of an explicit opt-out, deletion obligation, confidentiality restriction, or prohibition on model training may also materially increase risk.

Information Needed

Please provide the actual 135-word addition and any marked deletions or replacements. Without the substantive text, a reliable legal comparison and risk assessment cannot be completed.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out

The revised language adds:

• A link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• An opt-out link for Google Analytics:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

• A “click here” link for European users in the Google cookie/interest-based advertising section.

Legal significance: These additions improve transparency and provide an opt-out mechanism. However, the excerpt appears duplicated and grammatically incomplete in places, including repeated references to Google Analytics and analytics providers. The final notice should clearly identify which providers are used, what data they collect, the purposes, and whether consent is required in particular jurisdictions.

2. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The prior wording appears to have focused primarily on “Communications” and emails sent when communicating with users. The replacement expands the stated purposes to include:

• Providing products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalizing and customizing content;
• Improving the website;
• Contacting users about website, product, and service updates;
• Resolving problems and disputes; and
• Sending marketing and advertising believed to be of interest to the user.

Legal significance: This materially broadens the company’s claimed purposes for processing personal information, especially personalization, product improvement, and marketing. Depending on applicable law, these purposes may require additional disclosures, consent, opt-out rights, or a clear explanation of the legal basis for processing. The phrase “believe may be of interest” is broad and could support targeted marketing based on collected user information.

3. Customer communications

The revised text retains or expands language stating that the company will use the email address provided during registration for communications.

Legal significance: The provision should distinguish between transactional messages—such as account, service, or purchase communications—and promotional marketing. Marketing emails may be subject to consent and unsubscribe requirements under laws such as CAN-SPAM, GDPR, and other electronic-marketing rules.

4. AI model training

No express change concerning AI or machine learning was identified. The diff does not add or remove language stating that customer data, content, prompts, communications, or usage information may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models.

The new references to “personalize and customize content” and “make improvements to our website” are not, by themselves, an express authorization to train AI models. If AI training is intended, the privacy notice should address it directly, including:

• What customer data may be used;
• Whether data is de-identified or retained;
• Whether third-party AI providers receive the data;
• Whether users can opt out; and
• Whether customer content is used to improve general-purpose models.

5. Copyright and website footer language

New footer language claims copyright protection over the privacy notice and prohibits copying, redistribution, use, or publication. It also adds navigation links, contact details, support information, and references to GDPR/CCPA, cookie preferences, and accessibility.

Legal significance: The copyright restriction may be difficult to reconcile with users’ ability to retain or share legally required privacy disclosures. The added links should be verified and kept accurate.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual added or modified legal language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 135 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to determine:

• What contractual rights or obligations changed;
• Whether liability, confidentiality, security, intellectual-property, or termination terms were revised;
• Whether the customer’s data may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models;
• Whether customer data may be shared with affiliates, service providers, or third parties for AI-related purposes;
• Whether the customer can opt out of AI training or revoke consent;
• Whether data is anonymized, aggregated, de-identified, or retained after termination; or
• Whether the provider receives ownership or broad usage rights in customer inputs, outputs, or derived data.

AI-Training Risk

No specific AI-training language appears in the supplied diff. Therefore, no conclusion can be reached about whether the new language:

• Authorizes training on customer content by default;
• Limits training to de-identified or aggregated data;
• Restricts use to service improvement;
• Allows human review of customer data;
• Permits use of data to train third-party or general-purpose models; or
• Creates an opt-in or opt-out mechanism.

Required Information

To perform a meaningful legal analysis, please provide the actual 135 words added, together with any surrounding deleted or replacement language.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out links

The notice adds:

• A link explaining how Google collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A Google Analytics opt-out link:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

• Wording stating that the website uses analytics and crash-reporting services from several companies.

Risks and implications:

• The added disclosure provides greater transparency but should accurately identify all analytics and crash-reporting providers.
• The notice should explain what information is collected, the purposes of collection, retention, and whether data is transferred internationally.
• The opt-out mechanism may not address all tracking technologies or other providers.
• The language appears duplicated and structurally inconsistent in the diff, which could create an unclear or incomplete published notice.

2. European-user advertising link

The notice adds a “click here” link for European users in connection with Google cookies and interest-based advertising.

Risks and implications:

• The destination and function of the link should be verified.
• The notice should clearly explain consent requirements, cookie controls, and whether users can withdraw consent.
• A generic advertising opt-out may not satisfy all GDPR or ePrivacy requirements, particularly where prior consent is required.

3. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The previous wording concerning “Communications” and emails is replaced with broader purposes, including:

• Providing products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalizing and customizing content;
• Improving the website;
• Sending updates about the website, products, and services;
• Resolving problems and disputes;
• Sending marketing and advertising believed to be of interest.

The revised language also states that the company will use the email address provided during registration.

Risks and implications:

• The purposes are materially broader than merely communicating with customers.
• “Personalize,” “improve,” and “marketing and advertising” are broad and may support profiling or targeted advertising.
• The notice does not clearly distinguish service communications from promotional communications or explain applicable consent and opt-out rights.
• The revised wording may authorize use of registration data for marketing beyond the customer’s original expectations.
• The duplicated fragments suggest the final notice should be carefully reviewed for grammatical and substantive accuracy.

4. AI-model training

No express change concerning AI training was identified.

The diff does not state that customer data, website activity, communications, or content may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models. It also does not prohibit such use. The expanded “personalize,” “improve,” and analytics language should not automatically be treated as authorization for AI training; a specific disclosure and legal basis would generally be advisable if that use is intended.

5. Copyright and website footer language

New footer language claims copyright protection over the privacy notice and prohibits copying, redistribution, use, or publication. It also adds navigation links, contact information, and a 2026 copyright reference.

Risk: The prohibition may be overbroad and could conflict with legally required privacy-notice access, regulatory requests, or users’ reasonable ability to retain a copy.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual contractual language. It only states that approximately 203 words were added. As a result, it is not possible to identify:

• Changes to the parties’ rights or obligations
• New legal, commercial, privacy, or security risks
• Changes to ownership or licensing of customer data
• Whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, or evaluate AI models
• Any opt-out, consent, retention, confidentiality, or deletion provisions
• Changes to liability, indemnification, or compliance obligations

AI Training and Customer Data

No substantive language concerning the use of customer data to train AI models is included in the supplied diff. Accordingly, it cannot be determined whether the new text:

• Permits the provider to use customer data for AI training
• Limits training use to aggregated, anonymized, or de-identified data
• Allows use of prompts, outputs, personal information, or telemetry
• Gives the customer an opt-out or requires affirmative consent
• Allows data to be shared with affiliates, vendors, or model providers
• Permits retention of data for model training after termination
• Grants the provider ownership or broad rights to derivative models or improvements

Required Information

Please provide the actual 203-word addition, preferably with the deleted and replacement text preserved using the stated notation. Without the contract language itself, no reliable legal analysis can be performed.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual contractual language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 135 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to identify:

• Changes to customer data rights or permitted uses
• Whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, validate, or improve AI models
• Any new data-retention, confidentiality, security, or disclosure obligations
• Changes to intellectual-property ownership or licensing
• New customer consent requirements or opt-out rights
• Liability, indemnification, or regulatory risks

AI Training/Data-Use Analysis

No substantive language concerning AI model training or customer-data use is included in the supplied diff. Therefore, no conclusion can be reached about whether the revised terms:

• Permit the provider to use customer data for model training
• Allow use of aggregated, de-identified, or anonymized data
• Permit human review or sharing with affiliates or third-party providers
• Grant the provider ownership of outputs, derivatives, or trained models
• Restrict or prohibit use of customer data for training
• Provide an opt-out mechanism or require prior consent

Required Information

Please provide the actual redlined text, including the approximately 135 added words and any surrounding provisions. The additions should be shown in {braces} and deletions in [brackets] as described. Without the underlying wording, a legal-risk analysis would be speculative.

Summary

The provided diff only states:

> “Added approximately 135 words to the document”

It does not include the actual added, deleted, or replaced legal language. As a result, it is not possible to identify:

• Changes to the parties’ rights or obligations
• New liability, indemnity, confidentiality, or termination risks
• Changes to data ownership, access, retention, or sharing
• Whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models
• Any opt-in, opt-out, consent, or anonymization requirements relating to AI training

AI Training/Data-Use Review

No substantive language addressing AI models or customer data is included in the supplied diff. Therefore, no conclusion can be reached about whether the amendment:

• Permits use of customer data or inputs for model training
• Allows use of derived data, metadata, prompts, outputs, or usage information
• Applies training rights by default or only with customer consent
• Limits training to de-identified, aggregated, or anonymized data
• Allows disclosure of customer data to affiliates, vendors, or model providers
• Gives the customer a right to opt out or require deletion

Required Information

Please provide the actual 135 words added to the document, together with any deleted or replacement language using the stated notation. The legal impact and AI-data risks can then be analyzed accurately.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Analytics and Tracking Disclosures

• Adds a “click here” link for European users, apparently directing them to additional privacy information or controls. The destination is not included in the diff, so its purpose should be verified.
• Adds a link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data:
• https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners
• Adds an opt-out link for Google Analytics:
• https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout
• The revised language appears to clarify that Google Analytics and related analytics/crash-reporting services collect information about website use.
• The text references the Meta Pixel and retargeting, but the diff does not clearly show whether this is newly added or merely surrounding context. If newly introduced, it indicates use of Meta tracking technology for advertising or audience targeting.

Risk: These additions increase transparency but also confirm sharing of visitor data with Google and potentially Meta. The notice should explain what data is collected, the legal basis for processing, cookie-consent requirements, retention, and how users can exercise rights—especially for European users.

2. Expanded Uses of Customer Information

The prior wording concerning “Communications” and emails is replaced with a broader list of purposes. The company now states that it may use information to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalize and customize content;
• Improve the website;
• Contact users about updates to the website, products, and services;
• Resolve problems and disputes; and
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest.

The revised text also appears to continue stating that the company will use the email address provided during registration for communications.

Risks:

• The purposes are materially broader than merely communicating with customers.
• “Personalize,” “improve,” and marketing purposes are relatively open-ended and may permit profiling or targeted advertising.
• The language does not specify whether marketing requires consent, how users can opt out, or whether data is shared with advertising providers.
• “Information we receive from you” is broad and does not limit the categories of data covered.

3. AI Model Training

• No express change addresses the use of customer data to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models.
• The new references to “personalize and customize content” and “make improvements to our website” should not automatically be read as authorization for AI training, but they could be interpreted broadly if the company uses AI systems for those purposes.
• If customer data may be used for AI training, the notice should state this expressly, identify the data involved, explain whether data is shared with AI providers, and provide applicable consent or opt-out mechanisms.

4. New Copyright and Website Footer Language

• Adds a copyright notice claiming that the privacy notice is protected by U.S. and foreign copyrights and prohibiting copying, redistribution, use, or publication.
• Adds extensive footer links and contact information.

Risk: The copyright language may conflict with expectations that privacy notices be freely accessible and shareable, particularly where users need to provide them to regulators or advisers.

Summary

The supplied diff does not include the text of the approximately 135 added words. It only states that words were added, so the legal effect of the changes cannot be determined.

AI Training and Customer Data

• No conclusions can be drawn about whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models.
• It is also impossible to assess whether the added language:
• Expands the definition of permitted data use;
• Allows use of customer content for model training or product improvement;
• Applies an opt-in or opt-out mechanism;
• Permits de-identification, aggregation, or retention of customer data;
• Allows sharing with affiliates, vendors, or AI providers; or
• Limits the customer’s ability to object to such use.

Other Legal Risks

The missing text may affect important provisions concerning:

• Data ownership and intellectual-property rights;
• Confidentiality and privacy obligations;
• Data retention and deletion;
• Security and breach responsibilities;
• Use of subprocessors or third-party AI services;
• Liability, indemnification, and warranties; and
• Compliance with data-protection laws.

Required Information

Please provide the actual added language and, if applicable, the surrounding provisions or a complete redline. Without the substantive text, no reliable comparison or risk analysis is possible.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The permitted uses of customer information have been substantially broadened. The revised language adds that information may be used to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased.
• Personalize and customize content.
• Improve the website, products, and services.
• Contact users about updates.
• Resolve problems and disputes.
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest to the user.

Risk: The new wording gives the company broader discretion to use customer data for personalization, product improvement, customer support, and targeted marketing. “Marketing and advertising that we believe may be of interest” is relatively subjective and may permit interest-based communications without more specific limits.

The changes also appear to reorganize or replace the prior “Communications” and “Emails” language. Because the diff is fragmented and repetitive, the final notice should be reviewed to confirm that the resulting provisions are grammatically complete and do not unintentionally create overlapping or inconsistent permissions.

2. Email communications

The revised language clarifies that the company will use the email address provided during registration when communicating with the user.

Risk: Although the text does not expressly state that all emails will be marketing emails, the new purposes include marketing and advertising. The notice should distinguish clearly between transactional/service emails and promotional communications, and should explain any opt-out or unsubscribe rights.

3. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out

The revision adds:

• A link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data.
• A link allowing users to opt out of Google Analytics.

Impact: This improves transparency and provides a stated opt-out mechanism. It does not, by itself, limit the data Google may collect or the company’s use of other analytics or crash-reporting providers.

4. Meta Pixel and retargeting

The notice now references the Meta (Facebook) Pixel and retargeting, apparently in connection with cookies and interest-based advertising.

Risk: Meta Pixel and retargeting may involve sharing identifiers, browsing activity, or other usage information with Meta for advertising and measurement. The notice should specify the categories of data shared, purposes, applicable consent requirements, and available opt-out or cookie-preference controls.

5. AI-model training

No express change identified. The diff contains no language stating that customer data, content, prompts, communications, or usage information may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve artificial-intelligence or machine-learning models. The added “improve our website, products, and services” language is broad, but it should not automatically be interpreted as an AI-training authorization unless the final policy or related terms say so expressly.

6. Copyright and website footer

A new copyright notice prohibits copying, redistribution, use, or publication of the privacy notice and adds extensive company navigation and contact information.

Risk: The prohibition is unusually broad and may conflict with legitimate legal, regulatory, archival, or user-reference purposes.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out mechanism

The revised text adds information about Google’s collection and processing practices, including a link to Google’s privacy information for partner websites:

• https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

It also adds an opt-out link for Google Analytics:

• https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

This improves transparency and gives users a stated mechanism to prevent Google Analytics from using their information. However, the diff appears to insert or repeat this language in multiple places, and the surrounding wording is incomplete or grammatically disjointed. The final notice should be reviewed to ensure the disclosure accurately describes all analytics and crash-reporting providers actually used.

2. European-user advertising link

The words “click here” are added after the reference to European users in the interest-based advertising section. This appears intended to create a link or provide additional information for European users.

Risk: The diff does not show the destination URL or explain what rights, choices, or disclosures the link provides. The final document should confirm that the link works and leads to the appropriate European privacy or advertising-choice information.

3. Expanded purposes for using personal information

The previous wording focused more narrowly on communications and emails. The replacement substantially expands the stated purposes for using customer information to include:

• Providing products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalizing and customizing content;
• Improving the website;
• Contacting users about website, product, and service updates;
• Resolving problems and disputes; and
• Sending marketing and advertising believed to be of interest.

This is a material expansion of the permitted-use description. It may give the company broader flexibility to use customer data for personalization, product improvement, customer support, and direct marketing.

Risk: The language “marketing and advertising that we believe may be of interest to you” is broad and does not explain consent requirements, opt-out rights, profiling, or whether third-party advertising platforms receive the data. These issues may be significant under GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, and similar laws.

4. AI-model training

The diff contains no express language authorizing, prohibiting, or describing the use of customer data to train artificial-intelligence or machine-learning models. It also does not state whether customer content, prompts, communications, or usage data may be used for AI training.

The new references to personalization, website improvements, analytics, and crash reporting should not automatically be interpreted as permission to train AI models, but they could be drafted broadly enough to create ambiguity. If AI training is intended, it should be addressed expressly, including data categories, purposes, providers, retention, opt-out rights, and whether data is de-identified.

5. Copyright and website-footer language

A large new block adds copyright restrictions, company links, contact information, legal links, and a “2026 ProProfs” reference. The copyright language purports to prohibit copying, redistribution, use, or publication of the privacy notice.

Risk: This may be overbroad or inconsistent with legally required privacy-notice transparency and users’ rights to retain or share notices. The added footer should also be checked for accuracy and consistency with the actual website.

Summary

The supplied diff does not include the actual amended legal language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 135 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to determine:

• What provisions were added, deleted, or replaced;
• Whether the changes alter the parties’ rights or obligations;
• Whether liability, confidentiality, termination, intellectual property, or compliance terms changed; or
• Whether the customer’s data may be used to train, improve, evaluate, or fine-tune AI models.

AI Training and Data-Use Analysis

No substantive language addressing AI, machine learning, model training, service improvement, data analytics, or use of customer data is included in the provided diff.

Therefore, no conclusion can be reached about whether:

• Customer data may be used to train general-purpose or customer-specific models;
• Prompts, inputs, outputs, usage data, or metadata may be retained or used for model improvement;
• The provider may share data with affiliates, subcontractors, or AI vendors;
• Customer data is anonymized, aggregated, de-identified, or otherwise protected before use;
• The customer can opt out of training or request deletion; or
• Data used for training remains subject to confidentiality and security obligations.

Risk Assessment

The diff is insufficient for legal risk analysis. The full text of the additions, deletions, and replacements is required. In particular, the AI/data-use provisions should be reviewed for:

1. Scope of “customer data” — whether it includes personal data, confidential information, prompts, outputs, and metadata.

2. Permitted purposes — whether use is limited to providing the services or expanded to product development, analytics, or AI training.

3. Retention and deletion — how long data is stored and whether backups or trained models are covered.

4. Opt-out rights — whether training use is automatic, optional, or prohibited.

5. Ownership and confidentiality — whether the provider obtains rights in inputs, outputs, or derived models.

6. Third-party disclosures — whether data may be sent to external model providers or subprocessors.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out information

The revised text adds:

• A link explaining how Google collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A Google Analytics opt-out link:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

Impact and risks

• This gives users more transparency and a specific mechanism to opt out of Google Analytics.
• The wording appears duplicated in the diff and may result in a drafting or formatting error in the final privacy notice.
• The surrounding language is incomplete, so it should be checked to ensure it clearly identifies all analytics and crash-reporting providers and accurately describes the data collected and shared.
• The reference to “For European users click here” is added near the advertising disclosure, but the destination and legal purpose of that link are not clear from the diff. It should be verified that it leads to the intended European privacy or consent controls.

2. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The prior wording appears to have focused primarily on communications and emails. The revised language adds or clarifies that information may be used to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased by customers.
• Personalize and customize content.
• Improve the website.
• Contact users about updates to the website, products, and services.
• Resolve problems and disputes.
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest to users.

Impact and risks

• The permitted purposes are materially broader than merely communicating with customers.
• “Personalize and customize content” and marketing purposes may involve profiling or targeted advertising and should be supported by an appropriate legal basis and consent mechanism where required.
• “Marketing and advertising that we believe may be of interest” is subjective and potentially broad. The notice should explain whether this includes email marketing, behavioral advertising, sharing with advertising partners, or automated profiling.
• The wording should distinguish necessary service communications from optional marketing communications and explain how users can unsubscribe.

3. No express AI-training provision identified

The diff does not add or remove language expressly addressing:

• Use of customer data to train, fine-tune, or improve AI models.
• Whether customer content, prompts, account information, or usage data may be provided to AI vendors.
• Whether data is used for generalized model training or only to provide services to the customer.
• Opt-out rights, retention limits, or human review relating to AI systems.

Accordingly, this diff does not appear to create a new express contractual right to use customer data for AI training. However, the broader purposes—particularly “improve the website,” “personalize and customize content,” and “provide products and services”—could be interpreted broadly unless limited elsewhere. The final notice should expressly state whether customer data is or is not used to train AI models.

4. Copyright and website-footer language

A large new block adds copyright protection language, navigation links, contact details, support information, and references to Terms, Privacy, GDPR/CCPA, cookie preferences, and related pages.

Impact and risks

• The copyright statement may be inappropriate or overly broad within a privacy notice.
• The added links and contact details should be verified for accuracy and consistency.
• The final document should be checked for duplicated text, broken sentence structure, and misplaced website-footer content.

Summary

The supplied diff does not include the actual added, deleted, or replaced contract language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 135 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to identify the legal effect of the changes or assess whether they alter the customer’s data rights, confidentiality protections, or permission to use data for AI model training.

AI Training and Data-Use Review

No language is provided addressing:

• Whether customer data may be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models;
• Whether prompts, inputs, outputs, uploaded files, or usage data are retained;
• Whether data is anonymized, aggregated, or de-identified before use;
• Whether customer data may be shared with affiliates, vendors, or third-party model providers;
• Whether the customer can opt out of AI training or revoke consent;
• Whether the provider claims ownership or broad usage rights in customer data or outputs; or
• Whether data may be transferred across jurisdictions or retained after termination.

Risk Assessment

Because the underlying wording is missing, no reliable conclusion can be reached about:

• New permissions granted to the provider;
• Restrictions imposed on the customer;
• Changes to confidentiality, security, privacy, or intellectual-property protections;
• Whether the provider can use customer data for commercial model development; or
• Whether the changes create compliance risks under applicable privacy or sector-specific laws.

Information Needed

Please provide the full diff, including the text marked with {added}, [deleted], and []{replacement}. The actual wording is necessary to perform a meaningful legal comparison and identify any new AI-training or data-use risks.

Summary of Important Changes

1. Google Analytics disclosures and opt-out mechanism

Added:

• A link to Google’s explanation of how it collects and processes data:

https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/partners

• A statement that users can prevent Google Analytics from using their information.
• A Google Analytics opt-out link:

https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

Potential risks/issues:

• The revised language improves transparency but appears duplicated or inserted inconsistently in the diff.
• The notice should clearly identify which Google services are used, what information they collect, and whether data is shared with Google for advertising or other purposes.
• The opt-out mechanism may not address all tracking technologies, such as cookies, pixels, or crash-reporting tools.

2. European-user link

Added:

• A “click here” link for European users in the section discussing Google cookies and interest-based advertising.

Potential risks/issues:

• The destination and purpose of the link are not shown. It should lead to a meaningful European privacy or cookie-preference mechanism.
• A generic link may be insufficient if European law requires specific information, consent controls, or withdrawal mechanisms.

3. Expanded purposes for using customer information

The prior wording focused primarily on communications and emails concerning the website. The revised language states that information may be used to:

• Provide products and services requested or purchased;
• Personalize and customize content;
• Improve the website;
• Contact users about website, product, and service updates;
• Resolve problems and disputes;
• Send marketing and advertising believed to be of interest.

New risks:

• The purposes are materially broader, especially personalization, product improvement, marketing, and advertising.
• “Marketing and advertising that we believe may be of interest” is subjective and may permit profiling or targeted advertising.
• The clause does not specify whether consent is required, how users can opt out, or whether information is shared with advertising partners.
• “Improve our website” and “resolve problems and disputes” are broad and could cover extensive internal analysis.

4. AI-model training

No express change identified.

The diff does not add language authorizing the customer’s data, content, prompts, communications, or other information to be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve artificial-intelligence models. It also does not add an express prohibition on such use.

Accordingly, the revised purposes should not be interpreted as clear AI-training authorization. If AI training is intended, it should be addressed expressly, including data categories, purposes, retention, opt-out rights, de-identification, and third-party model providers.

5. New copyright and website-footer language

Added:

• Copyright-protection language prohibiting copying, redistribution, use, or publication of the privacy notice.
• Additional navigation links, contact details, support information, legal links, and a 2026 copyright reference.

Potential risks/issues:

• The broad prohibition may conflict with users’ ability to retain, share, or reference the notice for legal or compliance purposes.
• The new footer content appears operational rather than privacy-related and should be checked for accuracy and consistency with the rest of the notice.

Summary

The provided diff does not include the actual contractual language. It only states:

> “Added approximately 135 words to the document”

Accordingly, it is not possible to determine:

• What provisions were added, removed, or replaced;
• Whether the changes create new legal or commercial obligations;
• Whether liability, confidentiality, security, intellectual property, termination, or compliance terms changed; or
• Whether the customer’s data may now be used to train, fine-tune, evaluate, or improve AI models.

AI Training and Data-Use Review

No substantive language concerning AI models or customer data is included in the supplied diff. Therefore, there is no basis to conclude whether the revised document:

• Permits or prohibits training models on customer data;
• Allows use of customer prompts, inputs, outputs, metadata, or usage data for model improvement;
• Applies consent, opt-out, or default-permission rules;
• Allows use of aggregated, anonymized, or de-identified data;
• Permits subcontractors or affiliates to use the data;
• Retains data after termination; or
• Limits the provider’s obligations to delete or segregate customer data.

Information Needed

Please provide the full redline or the actual 135 words that were added, using the stated notation:

• {added text}
• [deleted text]
• []{replacement text}

Once the substantive language is provided, it can be reviewed for new permissions, restrictions, risks, and customer-data/AI-training implications.